• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定肿瘤学突破性治疗认定标准。

Developing standards for breakthrough therapy designation in oncology.

机构信息

Genentech, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Aug 15;19(16):4297-304. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0523. Epub 2013 May 29.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0523
PMID:23719260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3745545/
Abstract

In July 2012, Congress passed the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA). The Advancing Breakthrough Therapies for Patients Act was incorporated into a Title of FDASIA to expedite clinical development of new, potential "breakthrough" drugs or treatments that show dramatic responses in early-phase studies. Using this regulatory pathway, once a promising new drug candidate is designated as a "Breakthrough Therapy", the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and sponsor would collaborate to determine the best path forward to abbreviate the traditional three-phase approach to drug development. The breakthrough legislation requires that an FDA guidance be drafted that details specific requirements of the bill to aid FDA in implementing requirements of the Act. In this article, we have proposed criteria to define a product as a Breakthrough Therapy, and discussed critical components of the development process that would require flexibility in order to enable expedited development of a Breakthrough Therapy.

摘要

2012 年 7 月,美国国会通过了《食品药品监督管理局安全与创新法案》(FDASIA)。推进突破性治疗药物法案被纳入 FDASIA 的一个标题,以加快新的、有潜力的“突破性”药物或治疗方法的临床开发,这些药物或治疗方法在早期研究中显示出显著的反应。利用这一监管途径,一旦有前途的新药候选药物被指定为“突破性治疗药物”,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和赞助商将合作确定最佳前进道路,以缩短传统的药物开发三阶段方法。突破性立法要求起草一份 FDA 指南,详细说明法案的具体要求,以帮助 FDA 实施该法案的要求。在本文中,我们提出了定义突破性治疗药物的标准,并讨论了开发过程中需要灵活性的关键组成部分,以便能够加快突破性治疗药物的开发。

相似文献

1
Developing standards for breakthrough therapy designation in oncology.制定肿瘤学突破性治疗认定标准。
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Aug 15;19(16):4297-304. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0523. Epub 2013 May 29.
2
Premarket Pivotal Trial End Points and Postmarketing Requirements for FDA Breakthrough Therapies.FDA 突破性疗法的上市前关键试验终点和上市后要求。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2430486. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30486.
3
Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions: An Update on Breakthrough Therapy Designation.针对严重病症的加速计划:突破性疗法认定的最新情况
Clin Ther. 2015 Sep;37(9):2104-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
4
The Impact of Breakthrough Therapy Designation on Development Strategies and Timelines for Nononcology Drugs and Vaccines.突破性治疗药物认定对非肿瘤药物和疫苗研发策略及时间线的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Dec;100(6):603-605. doi: 10.1002/cpt.447. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.药物研发的特殊 FDA 认定:孤儿药、快速通道、加速批准、优先审评和突破性疗法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
Efficacy, Safety, and Regulatory Approval of Food and Drug Administration-Designated Breakthrough and Nonbreakthrough Cancer Medicines.美国食品和药物管理局指定的突破性和非突破性癌症药物的疗效、安全性和监管批准。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 20;36(18):1805-1812. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.1592. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
7
Drug development in serious diseases: the new "breakthrough therapy" designation.严重疾病药物研发:新的“突破性疗法”认定
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;95(5):483-5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.23.
8
Assessing the Impact of US Food and Drug Administration Breakthrough Therapy Designation Timing on Trial Characteristics and Development Speed.评估美国食品和药物管理局突破性治疗认定时间对试验特征和开发速度的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Oct;110(4):1018-1024. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2318. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
9
Trial Design and Efficacy Thresholds for Granting Breakthrough Therapy Designation in Oncology.肿瘤学中突破性治疗认定的试验设计和疗效阈值
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Aug;12(8):e810-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.012161. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
The FDA Oncology Center of Excellence and precision medicine.美国食品和药物管理局肿瘤卓越中心与精准医学
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2018 Feb;243(3):308-312. doi: 10.1177/1535370217740861. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Current landscape of innovative drug development and regulatory support in China.中国创新药物研发与监管支持的现状
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 Jul 22;10(1):220. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02267-y.
2
The Erosion of Healthcare and Scientific Integrity: A Growing Concern.医疗保健与科学诚信的侵蚀:日益令人担忧的问题。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Feb 21;17:23-43. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S506767. eCollection 2025.
3
New Anticancer Drugs: Reliably Assessing "Value" While Addressing High Prices.新型抗癌药物:在解决高价问题的同时,可靠地评估“价值”。

本文引用的文献

1
Regulatory review of novel therapeutics--comparison of three regulatory agencies.新型治疗药物的监管审查——三个监管机构的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2284-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1200223. Epub 2012 May 16.
2
Role of randomized phase III trials in an era of effective targeted therapies.在靶向治疗有效的时代,随机 III 期临床试验的作用。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 6;9(4):208-14. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.190.
3
Despite criticism of the FDA review process, new cancer drugs reach patients sooner in the United States than in Europe.
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 28;31(5):2453-2480. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050184.
4
Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand.治疗可及性、健康经济学与神奇魔杖的挥动。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Feb 16;29(2):1176-1189. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020100.
5
Recruitment, outcomes, and toxicity trends in phase I oncology trials: Six-year experience in a large institution.I 期肿瘤学试验中的招募、结果和毒性趋势:大型机构的六年经验。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Feb;5(2):e1465. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1465. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
6
Comment.评论。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2015;7(4):357-358. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2015.1094407. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies.提高晚期恶性肿瘤药物研发速度的重要性。
Cancer Med. 2018 May;7(5):1824-1836. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1454. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Systems medicine in colorectal cancer: from a mathematical model toward a new type of clinical trial.结直肠癌中的系统医学:从数学模型到新型临床试验
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2016 Jul;8(4):314-36. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1342. Epub 2016 May 30.
9
Update on Cardiovascular Safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: With a Special Focus on QT Interval, Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Overall Risk/Benefit.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂心血管安全性的最新进展:特别关注QT间期、左心室功能障碍及总体风险/获益
Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;38(8):693-710. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0300-1.
10
Breakthrough Drug Approval Process and Postmarketing ADR Reporting.突破性药物审批流程与上市后药品不良反应报告
Hosp Pharm. 2013 Nov;48(10):796-8. doi: 10.1310/hpj4810-796.
尽管人们对 FDA 的审查程序提出了批评,但新的癌症药物在美国上市的速度比在欧洲更快。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul;30(7):1375-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0231. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
4
Early accelerated approval for highly targeted cancer drugs.高靶向性抗癌药物的早期加速批准
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1087-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1100548.
5
Economics of new oncology drug development.新型肿瘤药物研发的经济学
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):209-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0803.