• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗可及性、健康经济学与神奇魔杖的挥动。

Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Rd., Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.

Life Saving Therapies Network, 173 Heath St., Ottawa, ON K1H 5E6, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2022 Feb 16;29(2):1176-1189. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020100.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol29020100
PMID:35200599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8870945/
Abstract

New drugs are expensive, in part due to excessive drug development costs. Governments are trying to reduce drug prices. This can delay access to effective agents. A country's access to new drugs correlates with prices they agree to pay. After Health Canada approves a drug, the Canadian Agency for Drug and Technologies in Health (CADTH) assesses it. CADTH's approval is usually contingent on it costing ≤CAD 50,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. This value (unchanged from the 1970s) is inappropriately low. An inflation-adjusted CAD 50,000 1975 QALY should translate into a CAD 250,000 2021 QALY. CADTH's target also does not consider that drug development costs have risen much faster than inflation or that new precision therapies may only be used in small populations. In a separate process, proposals from the Patented Medicines Price Review Board (PMPRB) would decrease initial Canadian drug prices by 20%, but prices would fall further as sales increased, with ultimate price reductions of up to 80%. PMPRB claims its proposal would not reduce drug access, but multiple analyses strongly suggest otherwise. Government price controls target the symptom (high prices), not the disease. They translate into shortages without solving the problem. CADTH and PMPRB approaches both threaten access to effective drugs.

摘要

新药价格昂贵,部分原因是药物研发成本过高。政府正试图降低药品价格,但这可能会延迟有效药物的普及。一个国家获得新药的机会与其愿意支付的价格有关。在加拿大卫生部批准一种药物后,加拿大药物和技术评估机构(CADTH)会对其进行评估。CADTH 的批准通常取决于药物的成本是否低于每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)支付 5 万加元(CAD)。这个价值(自 20 世纪 70 年代以来一直没有变化)过低。经通胀调整后,1975 年 5 万加元的 QALY 应换算为 2021 年的 25 万加元的 QALY。CADTH 的目标也没有考虑到药物研发成本的增长速度远高于通胀,或者新的精准疗法可能只适用于小部分人群。在一个单独的过程中,专利药品价格审查委员会(PMPRB)的提案将使加拿大的初始药品价格降低 20%,但随着销售额的增加,价格将进一步下降,最终降幅高达 80%。PMPRB 声称其提案不会降低药物的可及性,但多项分析强烈表明并非如此。政府的价格控制针对的是症状(高价格),而不是疾病本身。这会导致短缺,而无法解决问题。CADTH 和 PMPRB 的方法都可能威胁到有效药物的可获得性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/8870945/93a82fa5a9e6/curroncol-29-00100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/8870945/93a82fa5a9e6/curroncol-29-00100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/8870945/93a82fa5a9e6/curroncol-29-00100-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand.治疗可及性、健康经济学与神奇魔杖的挥动。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Feb 16;29(2):1176-1189. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020100.
2
Can Standard Health Technology Assessment Approaches Help Guide the Price of Orphan Drugs in Canada? A Review of Submissions to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Common Drug Review.标准的卫生技术评估方法能否帮助指导加拿大孤儿药的定价?对提交给加拿大卫生技术评估局通用药品评审的材料的综述。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug 24;12:445-457. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S264589. eCollection 2020.
3
Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.加拿大肿瘤药物卫生技术评估与价格谈判的及时性
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 25;16:437-445. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872. eCollection 2024.
4
The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.支付意愿阈值对肿瘤药物降价建议的影响:加拿大卫生药品和技术局所做评估综述
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 May;13(5):e230178. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0178. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
A Comparison of Pharmaceutical Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) Recommendations Amongst the Canadian Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB), Public and Private Payers.加拿大专利药品价格审查委员会(PMPRB)、公共和私人支付方之间的药品预算影响分析(BIA)建议比较
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Dec;3(4):437-451. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0139-y.
6
The impact of changing the reference countries on the list prices for patented medicines in Canada: A policy analysis.改变参考国家对加拿大专利药品目录价格的影响:政策分析。
Health Policy. 2024 Jun;144:105064. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105064. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
7
Generic competition in Canada.加拿大的仿制药竞争。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Nov;6(5):480-2. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406050-00010.
8
Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?加拿大罕见病药物的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:谁受益?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jun 13;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x.
9
Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada.提交给加拿大公共药品计划的药品预算影响分析实施指南。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(6):477-95. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826060-00003.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The value-for-money assessment and funding arrangements for high-priced drugs in an era of uncertainty: a comparative analysis of national health technology assessment agencies in South Korea, England, Australia, and Canada.不确定时代高价药品的性价比评估与资金安排:韩国、英国、澳大利亚和加拿大国家卫生技术评估机构的比较分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12207-9.
2
Access to Oncology Medicines in Canada: Consensus Forum for Recommendations for Improvement.加拿大肿瘤药物的可及性:改进建议共识论坛。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Mar 29;31(4):1803-1816. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040136.
3
Beyond Participation: Evaluating the Role of Patients in Designing Oncology Clinical Trials.

本文引用的文献

1
The need for speed in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A population kinetics assessment.晚期非小细胞肺癌中对速度的需求:群体动力学评估。
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(24):9040-9046. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4411. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
Regulatory and clinical consequences of negative confirmatory trials of accelerated approval cancer drugs: retrospective observational study.加速批准癌症药物阴性确证性试验的监管和临床后果:回顾性观察研究。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 8;374:n1959. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1959.
3
Randomized Clinical Trials in the Era of Precision Oncology-The Role of End Points, Industry Funding, and Medical Writing Integrity.
超越参与:评估患者在肿瘤临床试验设计中的作用。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 8;30(9):8310-8327. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090603.
精准肿瘤学时代的随机临床试验——终点、行业资助及医学写作诚信的作用
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Oct 1;7(10):1577-1578. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3338.
4
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Potential insights from population kinetic assessment of progression-free survival curves.从无进展生存曲线的群体药代动力学评估中获得的潜在见解。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Sep;153:103039. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103039. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
A novel, more reliable approach to use of progression-free survival as a predictor of gain in overall survival: The Ottawa PFS Predictive Model.一种新的、更可靠的方法,使用无进展生存期作为总生存期获益的预测指标:渥太华 PFS 预测模型。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Apr;148:102896. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102896. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
7
Does external reference pricing deliver what it promises? Evidence on its impact at national level.外部参考定价能否如其承诺的那样发挥作用?国家层面的影响证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Feb;21(1):129-151. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01116-4. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
8
Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.潜在生命年损失:加拿大癌症药物监管和筹资过程的影响。
Oncologist. 2020 Jan;25(1):e130-e137. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0314. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Time to initial cancer treatment in the United States and association with survival over time: An observational study.美国癌症初始治疗时间与随时间变化的生存情况的关系:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 1;14(3):e0213209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213209. eCollection 2019.
10
The growing role of precision and personalized medicine for cancer treatment.精准医学和个性化医学在癌症治疗中日益重要的作用。
Technology (Singap World Sci). 2018 Sep-Dec;6(3-4):79-100. doi: 10.1142/S2339547818300020. Epub 2019 Jan 11.