Suppr超能文献

视觉、体感和听觉诱发电位在非酒精性肝硬化患者亚临床肝性脑病检测中的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of visual, somatosensory, and auditory evoked potentials in the detection of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis.

作者信息

Mehndiratta M M, Sood G K, Sarin S K, Gupta M

机构信息

Department of Neurology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jul;85(7):799-803.

PMID:2371979
Abstract

To objectively determine the incidence of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy (SHE) and the relative sensitivity of different evoked potentials for its detection, 22 nonalcoholic cirrhotics without clinically detectable neurological abnormality and an equal number of matched healthy controls were studied. Of the three evoked potentials, visual evoked potential (VEP) studied by the pattern shift reversal method was not found to be abnormal in any patient. Short latency somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) was abnormal in one (4.5%) and brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) in nine (41%) patients. There was little advantage of performing both BAEP and SSEP in a patient, since the two together were abnormal in 10 (45.5%) patients, with SSEP adding only one more patient. Interpeak latencies I-III, III-V, and I-V in BAEP test were found to be the most sensitive parameters for the detection of SHE. Our results argue in favor of BAEP as the single investigation of choice for the objective assessment of SHE in patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

摘要

为客观确定亚临床肝性脑病(SHE)的发病率以及不同诱发电位检测SHE的相对敏感性,我们对22例无临床可检测到的神经异常的非酒精性肝硬化患者以及数量相等的匹配健康对照进行了研究。在三种诱发电位中,通过模式翻转法研究的视觉诱发电位(VEP)在任何患者中均未发现异常。短潜伏期体感诱发电位(SSEP)有1例(4.5%)异常,脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)有9例(41%)患者异常。对患者同时进行BAEP和SSEP检查几乎没有优势,因为两者同时异常的患者有10例(45.5%),SSEP仅多检出1例异常患者。BAEP测试中的峰间潜伏期I-III、III-V和I-V被发现是检测SHE最敏感的参数。我们的结果支持将BAEP作为对肝硬化患者SHE进行客观评估的单一首选检查方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验