剖宫产与术后感染性炎症并发症。II. 剖宫产术中两种抗生素预防方法的比较评估
[Cesarean section and postoperative infectious-inflammatory complications. II. A comparative evaluation of 2 methods for antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section].
作者信息
Dimitrov O, Dinov P, Martsenkova K, Khadzhiev Kh, Kolarov G, Georgieva G, Vasileva I
出版信息
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1990;29(1):32-5.
The authors compare two methods for antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious-inflammatory complications in cesarean section: 1. Widely distributed mass prophylaxis with penicillin and gentamicin and 2. selective prophylaxis with Azlocillin, performed after determination, of the degree of the risk. 233 cesarean section were included in the study, 122 of which were treated by the first method. 59 out of 11 cesarean sections were evaluated as such with high risk and respectively treated with Azlocillin, but 52 of the women with low risk were not treated with antibiotic. The results show the advantages and economic benefits of the selective antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section.
作者比较了剖宫产术中预防感染性炎症并发症的两种抗生素预防方法
- 广泛使用青霉素和庆大霉素进行大规模预防；2. 在确定风险程度后使用阿洛西林进行选择性预防。该研究纳入了233例剖宫产病例，其中122例采用第一种方法治疗。11例剖宫产中有59例被评估为高风险，并分别用阿洛西林治疗，但52例低风险女性未接受抗生素治疗。结果显示了剖宫产术中选择性抗生素预防的优势和经济效益。
Zotero 插件