Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, The Netherlands.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1025-34. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 May 28.
To investigate whether an exercise program, initially focusing on knee stabilization and subsequently on muscle strength and performance of daily activities is more effective than an exercise program focusing on muscle strength and performance of daily activities only, in reducing activity limitations in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and instability of the knee joint.
A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial involving 159 knee OA patients with self-reported and/or biomechanically assessed knee instability, randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Both groups received a supervised exercise program for 12 weeks, consisting of muscle strengthening exercises and training of daily activities, but only in the experimental group specific knee joint stabilization training was provided. Outcome measures included activity limitations (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index - WOMAC physical function, primary outcome), pain, global perceived effect and knee stability.
Both treatment groups demonstrated large (∼20-40%) and clinically relevant reductions in activity limitations, pain and knee instability, which were sustained 6 months post-treatment. No differences in effectiveness between experimental and control treatment were found on WOMAC physical function (B (95% confidence interval - CI) = -0.01 (-2.58 to 2.57)) or secondary outcome measures, except for a higher global perceived effect in the experimental group (P = 0.04).
Both exercise programs were highly effective in reducing activity limitations and pain and restoring knee stability in knee OA patients with instability of the knee. In knee OA patients suffering from knee instability, specific knee joint stabilization training, in addition to muscle strengthening and functional exercises, does not seem to have any additional value. Dutch Trial Register (NTR) registration number: NTR1475.
研究以膝关节稳定性为初始焦点、随后以肌肉力量和日常活动表现为焦点的运动方案与仅以肌肉力量和日常活动表现为焦点的运动方案相比,是否更能减轻膝关节骨关节炎(OA)和膝关节不稳定患者的活动受限。
这是一项单盲、随机、对照试验,纳入了 159 例自我报告和/或生物力学评估存在膝关节不稳定的膝 OA 患者,将其随机分配到两组治疗中。两组均接受 12 周的监督运动方案,包括肌肉强化运动和日常活动训练,但只有实验组提供特定的膝关节稳定性训练。主要结局是活动受限(WOMAC 骨关节炎指数-身体功能,WOMAC 物理功能),次要结局包括疼痛、整体感知效果和膝关节稳定性。
两组患者的活动受限、疼痛和膝关节不稳定均有较大(约 20-40%)和临床相关的改善,并且在治疗结束后 6 个月仍保持稳定。实验组和对照组在 WOMAC 物理功能(B(95%置信区间- CI)=-0.01(-2.58 至 2.57))或次要结局方面,没有发现治疗效果存在差异,只是实验组的整体感知效果更高(P=0.04)。
两种运动方案在减轻膝关节 OA 伴不稳定患者的活动受限、疼痛和恢复膝关节稳定性方面均有高度有效性。在膝关节不稳定的膝 OA 患者中,除了肌肉强化和功能锻炼之外,特定的膝关节稳定性训练似乎没有任何额外的价值。荷兰临床试验注册中心(NTR)注册号:NTR1475。