Suppr超能文献

开放性骨折中抗生素预防时间较短并不会增加后续感染的风险。

Short duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in open fractures does not enhance risk of subsequent infection.

机构信息

Geneva University Hospitals, 4 rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2013 Jun;95-B(6):831-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.30114.

Abstract

We undertook a retrospective case-control study to assess the clinical variables associated with infections in open fractures. A total of 1492 open fractures were retrieved; these were Gustilo and Anderson grade I in 663 (44.4%), grade II in 370 (24.8%), grade III in 310 (20.8%) and unclassifiable in 149 (10.0%). The median duration of prophylaxis was three days (interquartile range (IQR) 1 to 3), and the median number of surgical interventions was two (1 to 9). We identified 54 infections (3.6%) occurring at a median of ten days (IQR 5 to 20) after trauma. Pathogens intrinsically resistant to the empirical antibiotic regimen used (enterococci, Enterobacter spp, Pseudomonas spp) were documented in 35 of 49 cases (71%). In multivariable regression analyses, grade III fractures and vascular injury or compartment syndrome were significantly associated with infection. Overall, compared with one day of antibiotic treatment, two to three days (odds ratio (OR) 0.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 2.0)), four to five days (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.3 to 4.9)), or > five days (OR 1.4 (95% CI 0.4 to 4.4)) did not show any significant differences in the infection risk. These results were similar when multivariable analysis was performed for grade III fractures only (OR 0.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 3.4); OR 0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.1); and OR 1.7 (95% CI 0.5 to 6.2), respectively). Infection in open fractures is related to the extent of tissue damage but not to the duration of prophylactic antibiotic therapy. Even for grade III fractures, a one-day course of prophylactic antibiotics might be as effective as prolonged prophylaxis.

摘要

我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,以评估与开放性骨折感染相关的临床变量。共检索到 1492 例开放性骨折;其中 Gustilo 和 Anderson Ⅰ级 663 例(44.4%),Ⅱ级 370 例(24.8%),Ⅲ级 310 例(20.8%),无法分类 149 例(10.0%)。预防用药的中位持续时间为 3 天(四分位距(IQR)1 至 3),手术干预的中位数为 2 次(1 至 9 次)。我们在创伤后 10 天(IQR 5 至 20)发现了 54 例感染(3.6%)。在 49 例感染病例中,有 35 例(71%)存在对经验性抗生素方案固有耐药的病原体(肠球菌、肠杆菌属、假单胞菌属)。多变量回归分析显示,Ⅲ级骨折和血管损伤或筋膜间室综合征与感染显著相关。总体而言,与 1 天的抗生素治疗相比,2 至 3 天(比值比(OR)0.6(95%置信区间(CI)0.2 至 2.0))、4 至 5 天(OR 1.2(95%CI 0.3 至 4.9))或> 5 天(OR 1.4(95%CI 0.4 至 4.4))在感染风险方面没有显示出任何显著差异。当仅对 Ⅲ级骨折进行多变量分析时,结果相似(OR 0.3(95%CI 0.1 至 3.4);OR 0.6(95%CI 0.2 至 2.1);OR 1.7(95%CI 0.5 至 6.2))。开放性骨折感染与组织损伤程度有关,但与预防性抗生素治疗时间无关。即使对于 Ⅲ级骨折,1 天的预防性抗生素疗程也可能与延长的预防疗程一样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验