Skaggs David L, Friend Lauren, Alman Benjamin, Chambers Henry G, Schmitz Michael, Leake Brett, Kay Robert M, Flynn John M
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, MS# 69, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jan;87(1):8-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01561.
Traditional recommendations hold that open fractures in both children and adults require urgent surgical debridement for a number of reasons, including the preservation of soft-tissue viability and vascular status as well as the prevention of infection. Following the widespread use of early administration of antibiotics, a number of single-institution studies challenged the belief that urgent surgical debridement decreases the risk of acute infection.
We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of open fractures that had been treated at six tertiary pediatric medical centers between 1989 and 2000. The standard protocol at each medical center was for all children to be given intravenous antibiotics upon arrival in the emergency department. The medical records of all children with open fractures were reviewed to identify the location of the fracture, the interval between the injury and the time of surgery, the Gustilo and Anderson classification, and the occurrence of acute infection.
The analysis included 554 open fractures in 536 consecutive patients who were eighteen years of age or younger. The overall infection rate was 3% (sixteen of 554). The infection rate was 3% (twelve of 344) for fractures that had been treated within six hours after the injury, compared with 2% (four of 210) for those that had been treated at least seven hours after the injury; this difference was not significant (p = 0.43). When the fractures were separated according to the Gustilo and Anderson classification system, there were no significant differences in the infection rate between those that had been treated within six hours after the injury and those that had been treated at least seven hours after the injury. Specifically, these infection rates were 2% (three of 173) and 2% (two of 129), respectively, for type-I fractures, 3% (three of 110) and 0% (zero of forty-four), respectively, for type-II fractures, and 10% (six of sixty-one) and 2% (two of thirty-seven), respectively, for type-III fractures (p > 0.05 for all three comparisons).
In the present retrospective, multicenter study of children with Gustilo and Anderson type-I, II, and III open fractures, the rates of acute infection were similar regardless of whether surgery was performed within six hours after the injury or at least seven hours after the injury. The findings of the present study suggest that, in children who receive early antibiotic therapy following an open fracture, surgical debridement within six hours after the injury offers little benefit over debridement within twenty-four hours after the injury with regard to the prevention of acute infection.
传统观点认为,儿童和成人的开放性骨折均需紧急手术清创,原因有多种,包括保持软组织活力和血管状态以及预防感染。随着早期使用抗生素的广泛普及,一些单机构研究对紧急手术清创可降低急性感染风险这一观点提出了质疑。
我们对1989年至2000年间在6家三级儿科医疗中心接受治疗的开放性骨折进行了一项回顾性多中心研究。每个医疗中心的标准方案是所有儿童在抵达急诊科后即给予静脉抗生素治疗。对所有开放性骨折患儿的病历进行审查,以确定骨折部位、受伤至手术的时间间隔、Gustilo和Anderson分类以及急性感染的发生情况。
分析纳入了536例18岁及以下连续患者的554例开放性骨折。总体感染率为3%(554例中的16例)。受伤后6小时内接受治疗的骨折感染率为3%(344例中的12例),而受伤后至少7小时接受治疗的骨折感染率为2%(210例中的4例);差异无统计学意义(p = 0.43)。根据Gustilo和Anderson分类系统对骨折进行分类时,受伤后6小时内接受治疗的骨折与受伤后至少7小时接受治疗的骨折之间的感染率无显著差异。具体而言,I型骨折的感染率分别为2%(173例中的3例)和2%(129例中的2例),II型骨折分别为3%(110例中的3例)和0%(44例中的0例),III型骨折分别为10%(61例中的6例)和2%(37例中的2例)(所有三项比较的p>0.05)。
在本项针对Gustilo和Anderson I型、II型和III型开放性骨折患儿的回顾性多中心研究中,无论手术是在受伤后6小时内还是至少7小时后进行,急性感染率均相似。本研究结果表明,对于开放性骨折后接受早期抗生素治疗的儿童,在预防急性感染方面,受伤后6小时内进行手术清创与受伤后24小时内进行清创相比,益处不大。