Wijayasiriwardena Chandima, Premakumara Sirimal
Senior Research Scientist, Herbal Technology Section, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ayu. 2012 Jul;33(3):441-3. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.108863.
Medicinal plant materials are being adulterated in commerce due to many reasons such as similar morphological features, same name as written in classical text, presence of similar active principles in the substituted plant etc., that may badly affect the therapeutic activity of the finished products. Therefore, systematic identification is becoming essential in order to produce standardized finished herbal products. The present study includes two medicinal plant rhizomes; Alpinia calcarata Roscoe (Heenaratta) and A. galanga (Linn.) Willd (Aratta) whose microscopical build up was different from each other and was assessed by standard Pharmacognostical methods. Diagnostic identification characters of A. calcarata were compound starch grins, triangular-shaped starch grains, and plenty of simple starch grains in one parenchyma cell compared to that of A. galanga. Diamond-shaped silica crystals were found only on A. galanga rhizome powder. Present study has revealed an easy technique to identify two similar medicinal plant materials microscopically and this method can also be employed to detect the degree of adulteration in powdered raw medicinal plant materials as well.
由于多种原因,药用植物材料在商业中存在掺假现象,如形态特征相似、与经典文献中记载的名称相同、替代植物中存在相似的活性成分等,这些都可能严重影响成品的治疗活性。因此,为了生产标准化的成品草药产品,系统鉴定变得至关重要。本研究包括两种药用植物根茎;距花山姜(Heenaratta)和大高良姜(Aratta),它们的微观结构彼此不同,并通过标准的生药学方法进行评估。与大高良姜相比,距花山姜的诊断鉴定特征为复合淀粉粒、三角形淀粉粒以及一个薄壁细胞中有大量单粒淀粉粒。仅在大高良姜根茎粉末中发现菱形硅晶体。本研究揭示了一种在显微镜下鉴定两种相似药用植物材料的简便技术,该方法也可用于检测粉末状生药用植物材料的掺假程度。