Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Politécnica de València, València, Spain.
PLoS One. 2013 May 28;8(5):e64657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064657. Print 2013.
The cellular multiplicity of infection (MOI) is a key parameter for describing the interactions between virions and cells, predicting the dynamics of mixed-genotype infections, and understanding virus evolution. Two recent studies have reported in vivo MOI estimates for Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), using sophisticated approaches to measure the distribution of two virus variants over host cells. Although the experimental approaches were similar, the studies employed different definitions of MOI and estimation methods. Here, new model-selection-based methods for calculating MOI were developed. Seven alternative models for predicting MOI were formulated that incorporate an increasing number of parameters. For both datasets the best-supported model included spatial segregation of virus variants over time, and to a lesser extent aggregation of virus-infected cells was also implicated. Three methods for MOI estimation were then compared: the two previously reported methods and the best-supported model. For CaMV data, all three methods gave comparable results. For TMV data, the previously reported methods both predicted low MOI values (range: 1.04-1.23) over time, whereas the best-supported model predicted a wider range of MOI values (range: 1.01-2.10) and an increase in MOI over time. Model selection can therefore identify suitable alternative MOI models and suggest key mechanisms affecting the frequency of coinfected cells. For the TMV data, this leads to appreciable differences in estimated MOI values.
细胞感染复数(MOI)是描述病毒粒子与细胞相互作用、预测混合基因型感染动态和理解病毒进化的关键参数。最近的两项研究使用复杂的方法来测量两种病毒变体在宿主细胞上的分布,报告了烟草花叶病毒(TMV)和花椰菜花叶病毒(CaMV)的体内 MOI 估计值。尽管实验方法相似,但这些研究采用了不同的 MOI 定义和估计方法。在这里,开发了新的基于模型选择的 MOI 计算方法。提出了七种预测 MOI 的替代模型,这些模型包含了越来越多的参数。对于两个数据集,最佳支持的模型都包含病毒变体随时间的空间分离,并且在较小程度上也暗示了病毒感染细胞的聚集。然后比较了三种 MOI 估计方法:之前报道的两种方法和最佳支持的模型。对于 CaMV 数据,这三种方法都给出了可比的结果。对于 TMV 数据,之前报道的两种方法都预测了随时间推移的低 MOI 值(范围:1.04-1.23),而最佳支持的模型预测了更广泛的 MOI 值范围(范围:1.01-2.10)和随时间推移的 MOI 值增加。因此,模型选择可以识别合适的替代 MOI 模型,并提示影响共感染细胞频率的关键机制。对于 TMV 数据,这导致了估计的 MOI 值的明显差异。