Ko Match W L, Leung Leo K K, Lam David C C
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, People Republic of China.
Mol Cell Biomech. 2012 Dec;9(4):251-68.
Inter-individual differences in corneal properties are ignored in existing methods for measuring intraocular pressure IOP, a primary parameter used in screening and monitoring of glaucoma. The differences in the corneal stiffness between individuals can be more than double and this difference would lead to IOP measurement errors up to 10 mmHg. In this study, an instrumented partial-contact indentation measurement and analysis method that can account for inter-individual corneal difference in stiffness is developed. The method was tested on 12 porcine eyes ex vivo and 7 rabbit eyes in vivo, and the results were compared to the controlled IOPs to determine the method's validity. Analyses showed that without corneal stiffness correction, up to 10 mmHg of measurement error was found between the existing approach and the controlled IOP. With the instrumented indentation and analysis method, less than 2 mmHg of differences were founded between the measured IOP and the controlled IOP. These results showed that instrumented partial-contact indentation can effectively account for inter-individual corneal variations in IOP measurement.
在用于测量眼压(IOP)的现有方法中,角膜特性的个体差异被忽略了,眼压是青光眼筛查和监测中的一个主要参数。个体之间角膜硬度的差异可能超过两倍,这种差异会导致眼压测量误差高达10 mmHg。在本研究中,开发了一种仪器化的部分接触压痕测量和分析方法,该方法可以考虑个体间角膜硬度的差异。该方法在12只离体猪眼和7只活体兔眼上进行了测试,并将结果与对照眼压进行比较,以确定该方法的有效性。分析表明,在不进行角膜硬度校正的情况下,现有方法与对照眼压之间存在高达10 mmHg的测量误差。采用仪器化压痕和分析方法时,测量眼压与对照眼压之间的差异小于2 mmHg。这些结果表明,仪器化部分接触压痕可以有效地考虑眼压测量中个体间角膜的差异。