Suppr超能文献

有或没有运动机会的栓系饲养系统中奶牛的福利质量。

Dairy cows welfare quality in tie-stall housing system with or without access to exercise.

机构信息

Department of Animal Hygiene and Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Acta Vet Scand. 2013 Jun 1;55(1):43. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-43.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tie-stall housing of dairy cows is used extensively worldwide, despite of the welfare concerns regarding the restriction of voluntary movement and limitation of expression of the cows' natural behaviour. The aim of this study was to compare the welfare quality of dairy cows kept in two types of tie-stall housing systems: with regular outdoor exercise and without access to exercise. In addition, the study investigated the relationship between different welfare measures of dairy cows kept in tie-stalls.

METHODS

3,192 lactating cows were assessed using the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle in 80 commercial dairy farms, half of the farms providing outdoor access for the animals to exercise. The descriptive statistical indicators were determined for the assessed measures and for the welfare criteria and principle scores. The data obtained in the two housing types were compared and the correlation coefficients were calculated between the different welfare measures.

RESULTS

The significant differences found between the two housing systems for the majority of the animal based measures indicate the positive effect of exercise on the welfare of tethered cows. Many of the animal welfare parameters correlated with each other. For the farms allowing the cows' turnout in a paddock, pasture or both, the mean scores for the welfare criteria and principles were higher than for the farms with permanent tethering of the cows, except the criteria absence of prolonged hunger and expression of social behaviours. The lowest scores were obtained for the criterion positive emotional state, in both housing systems. With regard to the overall classification, none of the farms were considered excellent. In the not classified category were only farms with all-year-round tethering of the animals and in the enhanced category only farms where the cows had outdoor access.

CONCLUSIONS

The welfare quality of the investigated dairy cows was significantly better in the tie-stall farms which allow exercise for cows (paddocks, pasture or both) than in those which do not. In the light of our results we consider that dairy cattle welfare is not necessarily poor in tie-stall housing systems, its quality depending on the management practices.

摘要

背景

尽管奶牛的自由活动受到限制,其自然行为表达受到限制,引起了人们对福利的关注,但全球仍广泛使用奶牛的拴系饲养。本研究的目的是比较两种拴系饲养系统中奶牛的福利质量:有规律的户外运动和无运动机会。此外,本研究还调查了拴系饲养奶牛的不同福利措施之间的关系。

方法

在 80 个商业奶牛场中,使用 Welfare Quality®评估方案对 3192 头泌乳奶牛进行评估,其中一半的奶牛场为动物提供了户外锻炼的机会。为评估的措施以及福利标准和原则评分确定了描述性统计指标。比较了两种饲养类型的数据,并计算了不同福利措施之间的相关系数。

结果

大多数基于动物的措施在两种饲养系统之间存在显著差异,这表明运动对拴系奶牛的福利有积极影响。许多动物福利参数相互关联。对于允许奶牛在围场、牧场或两者中放牧的农场,福利标准和原则的平均得分高于那些对奶牛进行永久性拴系的农场,除了长时间饥饿和表达社会行为的标准外。在两种饲养系统中,得分最低的是积极情绪状态标准。就整体分类而言,没有一个农场被认为是优秀的。在未分类的类别中,只有那些全年拴系动物的农场,而在增强类别中,只有那些允许奶牛有户外机会的农场。

结论

在允许奶牛(围场、牧场或两者)运动的拴系饲养场中,所研究奶牛的福利质量明显好于不允许奶牛运动的拴系饲养场。根据我们的结果,我们认为奶牛福利在拴系饲养系统中不一定差,其质量取决于管理实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ce/3674972/2594077abb7b/1751-0147-55-43-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验