Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Aug;101(8):7397-7411. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14232. Epub 2018 May 16.
The objective of this study was to examine the association of herd size with animal welfare in dairy cattle herds. Therefore, 80 conventional dairy cattle farms were classified by the number of cows into 4 herd size classes, C1 (<100 cows), C2 (100-299 cows), C3 (300-499 cows), and C4 (≥500 cows), and assessed using multiple animal-based measures of the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for dairy cattle. Data were recorded from April 2014 to September 2016 by an experienced single assessor in northern Germany. Each farm was visited 2 times at an interval of 6 mo (summer period and winter period) to avoid seasonal effects on the outcome. The average herd size was 383 ± 356 Holstein-Friesian cows (range 45 to 1,629). Only farms with freestall (cubicle) housing and a maximum of 6 h access to pasture per day were included in the study. Data were statistically analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. None of the farms reached the highest overall rating of "excellent." The majority of the farms were classified as "enhanced" (30%) or "acceptable" (66%), and at 6 assessments the farms were rated as "not classified" (4%). Regarding single indicators, mean trough length per cow, percentage of cows with nasal discharge, and vulvar discharge increased with increasing herd size, whereas it was vice versa for displacements of cows. Percentage of lean cows, percentage of dirty lower legs, and duration of the process of lying down showed a curvilinear relationship with the number of cows per farm. Herd size was not associated with any other measures of the Welfare Quality protocol. In conclusion, herd size effects were small, and consequently herd size cannot be considered as a feasible indicator of the on-farm animal welfare level. Housing conditions and management practices seem to have a greater effect on animal welfare than the number of dairy cows per farm.
本研究旨在探讨奶牛养殖规模与动物福利之间的关系。因此,我们将 80 个常规奶牛养殖场按照奶牛数量分为 4 个养殖规模类别,分别为 C1(<100 头)、C2(100-299 头)、C3(300-499 头)和 C4(≥500 头),并使用福利质量评估协议的多个基于动物的措施进行评估。数据于 2014 年 4 月至 2016 年 9 月期间由一名在德国北部具有丰富经验的单一评估员记录。每个农场每隔 6 个月(夏季和冬季)进行两次访问,以避免季节性因素对结果的影响。平均养殖规模为 383 ± 356 头荷斯坦-弗里生奶牛(范围为 45-1629 头)。只有采用牛舍(牛栏)饲养且每天最多有 6 小时放牧时间的农场才被纳入研究。使用广义线性混合模型对数据进行统计分析。没有一个农场达到了“优秀”的最高综合评分。大多数农场被归类为“增强”(30%)或“可接受”(66%),在 6 次评估中,有 4%的农场被归类为“无法归类”。关于单个指标,每头奶牛的牛槽长度、有鼻腔分泌物的奶牛比例和外阴分泌物的比例随着养殖规模的增加而增加,而奶牛的位移则相反。瘦牛比例、脏小腿比例和卧倒时间则与每头奶牛的农场数量呈曲线关系。养殖规模与福利质量协议的其他措施无关。总之,养殖规模的影响较小,因此养殖规模不能被视为农场动物福利水平的可行指标。养殖环境和管理实践对动物福利的影响似乎大于每个农场的奶牛数量。