St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065; email:
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14:215-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153448. Epub 2013 May 29.
Until the mid-nineteenth century, life expectancy at birth averaged 20 years worldwide, owing mostly to childhood fevers. The germ theory of diseases then gradually overcame the belief that diseases were intrinsic. However, around the turn of the twentieth century, asymptomatic infection was discovered to be much more common than clinical disease. Paradoxically, this observation barely challenged the newly developed notion that infectious diseases were fundamentally extrinsic. Moreover, interindividual variability in the course of infection was typically explained by the emerging immunological (or somatic) theory of infectious diseases, best illustrated by the impact of vaccination. This powerful explanation is, however, best applicable to reactivation and secondary infections, particularly in adults; it can less easily account for interindividual variability in the course of primary infection during childhood. Population and clinical geneticists soon proposed a complementary hypothesis, a germline genetic theory of infectious diseases. Over the past century, this idea has gained some support, particularly among clinicians and geneticists, but has also encountered resistance, particularly among microbiologists and immunologists. We present here the genetic theory of infectious diseases and briefly discuss its history and the challenges encountered during its emergence in the context of the apparently competing but actually complementary microbiological and immunological theories. We also illustrate its recent achievements by highlighting inborn errors of immunity underlying eight life-threatening infectious diseases of children and young adults. Finally, we consider the far-reaching biological and clinical implications of the ongoing human genetic dissection of severe infectious diseases.
直到 19 世纪中叶,全球出生时的预期寿命平均为 20 岁,这主要归因于儿童期发热。随后,疾病的细菌理论逐渐克服了疾病内在性的观念。然而,在 20 世纪之交,人们发现无症状感染比临床疾病更为常见。具有讽刺意味的是,这一观察结果几乎没有挑战新出现的传染病基本上是外在的观念。此外,感染过程中的个体间变异性通常可以用新兴的传染病免疫学(或体细胞)理论来解释,疫苗接种的影响就是最好的例证。然而,这种强大的解释最适用于再激活和二次感染,特别是在成年人中;它较难解释儿童期原发性感染过程中的个体间变异性。群体和临床遗传学家很快提出了一个互补假说,即传染病的种系遗传理论。在过去的一个世纪里,这个想法得到了一些支持,特别是在临床医生和遗传学家中,但也遇到了阻力,特别是在微生物学家和免疫学家中。我们在这里介绍传染病的遗传理论,并简要讨论其历史以及在与明显竞争但实际上互补的微生物学和免疫学理论出现时所遇到的挑战。我们还通过强调导致儿童和年轻人的八种危及生命的传染病的先天免疫缺陷,来说明其最近的成就。最后,我们考虑了正在进行的人类对严重传染病的遗传剖析的深远生物学和临床意义。