• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An evidenced-based scoring index to determine the periodontal prognosis on molars.基于证据的磨牙牙周预后判断评分指数。
J Periodontol. 2014 Feb;85(2):214-25. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120675. Epub 2013 May 31.
2
Periodontal treatment decisions for molars: an analysis of influencing factors and long-term outcome.磨牙的牙周治疗决策:影响因素及长期疗效分析
J Periodontol. 2000 Apr;71(4):579-85. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.579.
3
Mandibular disto-lingual root: a consideration in periodontal therapy.下颌远中舌侧根:牙周治疗中的一个考量因素
J Periodontol. 2007 Aug;78(8):1485-90. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060419.
4
Prognostic factors for the loss of molars--an 18-years retrospective cohort study.磨牙丧失的预后因素——一项 18 年回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Oct;42(10):943-50. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12460. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
The prevalence and alterations of furcation involvements 13 to 16 years after periodontal treatment.牙周治疗13至16年后根分叉病变的患病率及变化情况
Swed Dent J. 2013;37(2):87-95.
6
Tooth loss in individuals under periodontal maintenance therapy: 5-year prospective study.牙周维护治疗患者的牙齿缺失情况:一项5年前瞻性研究。
J Periodontal Res. 2014 Feb;49(1):121-8. doi: 10.1111/jre.12087. Epub 2013 May 7.
7
Treatment of molar furcation involvement using root separation and a crown and sleeve-coping telescopic denture. A longitudinal study.使用牙根分离以及冠和套筒冠可摘义齿治疗磨牙根分叉病变:一项纵向研究
J Periodontol. 1999 Sep;70(9):1098-109. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.9.1098.
8
Factors influencing the outcome of root-resection therapy in molars: a 10-year retrospective study.影响磨牙牙根切除术治疗效果的因素:一项10年回顾性研究
J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):32-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080316.
9
Variables affecting tooth survival and changes in probing depth: a long-term follow-up of periodontitis patients.影响牙齿留存率及探诊深度变化的因素:牙周炎患者的长期随访
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Jun;42(6):513-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12419. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
10
Is furcation involvement in maxillary molars a predictor for subsequent bone augmentation prior to implant placement? A pilot study.上颌磨牙的根分叉病变是否是种植体植入前后续骨增量的预测指标?一项初步研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Dec;25(12):1352-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12275. Epub 2013 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Rooting for the Future: Combating Dental Deforestation.为未来扎根:对抗牙齿缺失
Int Dent J. 2025 Aug 2;75(5):100930. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100930.
2
Experts consensus on management of tooth luxation and avulsion.专家关于牙齿脱位和脱出处理的共识。
Int J Oral Sci. 2024 Sep 26;16(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00321-z.
3
Metatranscriptomic analysis shows functional alterations in subgingival biofilm in young smokers with periodontitis: a pilot study.基于宏转录组学的研究显示:牙周炎伴吸烟的年轻患者龈下菌斑生物膜的功能发生了改变:一项初步研究
J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Aug 16;32:e20240031. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0031. eCollection 2024.
4
Ten-year prognostic outcomes of molar survival using the Miller-Mcentire Periodontal Prognostic Index - A longitudinal prospective study.使用米勒-麦肯蒂尔牙周预后指数评估磨牙生存率的十年预后结果——一项纵向前瞻性研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2024 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-78. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_542_23. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
5
Do patients deserve more information in deciding whether to extract their teeth or to maintain their teeth?在决定是拔牙还是保留牙齿时,患者是否应该获得更多信息?
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2024 Jan-Feb;28(1):3-4. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_86_24. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
6
Advancements in Methods of Classification and Measurement Used to Assess Tooth Mobility: A Narrative Review.用于评估牙齿松动度的分类和测量方法的进展:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):142. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010142.
7
Machine Learning in Predicting Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review and Risk of Bias Assessment.机器学习在预测牙齿缺失中的应用:一项系统评价与偏倚风险评估
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 9;12(10):1682. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101682.
8
Comparison Study of Diagnosis and Treatment Planning for Dental Infections between Dental Students and Practitioners.牙科学生与从业者对牙感染的诊断和治疗计划的比较研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 26;10(8):1393. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081393.
9
A 5-year Prospective validation of the Miller-McEntire Periodontal Prognostic Index.米勒-麦肯蒂尔牙周预后指数的5年前瞻性验证
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 Mar-Apr;26(2):157-161. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_21. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
Development of a prognostic tool: based on risk factors for tooth loss after active periodontal therapy.预后工具的开发:基于牙周治疗活跃期后牙齿缺失的风险因素。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):813-822. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04060-x. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The lifetime direct cost of periodontal treatment: a case study from a Norwegian specialist practice.牙周治疗的终身直接成本:挪威专科诊所的一项病例研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 Dec;83(12):1455-62. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110689. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
2
Prospective study in periodontal maintenance therapy: comparative analysis between academic and private practices.前瞻性牙周维护治疗研究:学术和私人实践的对比分析。
J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):301-11. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110101. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
3
Periodontal regeneration versus extraction and prosthetic replacement of teeth severely compromised by attachment loss to the apex: 5-year results of an ongoing randomized clinical trial.牙周再生与因根尖附着丧失而严重受损的牙齿拔除和修复替代:一项正在进行的随机临床试验的 5 年结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Oct;38(10):915-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01768.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
4
Comprehensive periodontal therapy: a statement by the American Academy of Periodontology *.综合牙周治疗:美国牙周病学会声明*
J Periodontol. 2011 Jul;82(7):943-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.117001.
5
Periodontal risk assessment model in a sample of regular and irregular compliers under maintenance therapy: a 3-year prospective study.维持治疗中定期和不定期依从者样本中的牙周风险评估模型:一项为期 3 年的前瞻性研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):292-300. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110187. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
6
The effect of smoking on periodontal bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.吸烟对牙周骨再生的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Periodontol. 2012 Feb;83(2):143-55. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110130. Epub 2011 May 31.
7
Oral impact on daily performance, personality traits, and compliance in periodontal maintenance therapy.口腔对日常行为、个性特征和牙周维护治疗顺应性的影响。
J Periodontol. 2011 Aug;82(8):1146-54. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.100515. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
8
Modified periodontal risk assessment score: long-term predictive value of treatment outcomes. A retrospective study.改良牙周病风险评估评分:治疗效果的长期预测价值。一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 May;37(5):427-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01553.x.
9
Compliance as a prognostic indicator. II. Impact of patient's compliance to the individual tooth survival.顺应性作为预后指标。II. 患者对个体牙齿存活的顺应性的影响。
J Periodontol. 2010 Sep;81(9):1280-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100039.
10
Tooth loss in 776 treated periodontal patients.776 例牙周病患者的失牙情况。
J Periodontol. 2010 Feb;81(2):244-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090184.

基于证据的磨牙牙周预后判断评分指数。

An evidenced-based scoring index to determine the periodontal prognosis on molars.

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2014 Feb;85(2):214-25. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120675. Epub 2013 May 31.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2013.120675
PMID:23725028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4104765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study evaluates and assigns scores to six prognostic factors and derives a quantitative scoring index used to determine the periodontal prognosis on molar teeth.

METHODS

Data were gathered on 816 molars in 102 patients with moderate-to-severe periodontitis. The six factors evaluated (age, probing depth, mobility, furcation involvement, smoking, and molar type) were assigned a numeric score based on statistical analysis. The sum of the scores for all factors was used to determine the prognosis score for each molar. Only patients with all first and second molars at the initial examination qualified for the study. All patients were evaluated a minimum of 15 years after treatment.

RESULTS

The post-treatment time ranged from 15 to 40 years and averaged 24 years. When the study was completed, 639 molars survived (78%), and, of those surviving molars, 588 survived and were periodontally healthy (92%). In molars with lower scores (scores 1-3), the 15-year survival rates ranged from 98% to 96%. In molars with middle scores (scores 4-6), the 15-year survival rates ranged from 95% to 90%, and, for molars with higher scores (scores 7-10), the survival rates ranged from 86% to 67%.

CONCLUSION

The present results indicate that the periodontal prognosis of molars diagnosed with moderate-to-severe periodontitis can be calculated using an evidence-based scoring index.

摘要

背景

本回顾性研究评估并为六个预后因素评分,并得出一个定量评分指数,用于确定磨牙的牙周预后。

方法

收集了 102 名中重度牙周炎患者的 816 颗磨牙的数据。根据统计分析,评估了 6 个因素(年龄、探诊深度、松动度、分叉受累、吸烟和磨牙类型),并根据这些因素的评分确定每个磨牙的预后评分。只有在初始检查时所有第一和第二磨牙都存在的患者才有资格参加研究。所有患者在治疗后至少 15 年进行评估。

结果

治疗后时间范围为 15 至 40 年,平均为 24 年。当研究完成时,639 颗磨牙存活(78%),在存活的磨牙中,588 颗磨牙存活且牙周健康(92%)。在评分较低的磨牙(评分 1-3)中,15 年生存率从 98%到 96%不等。在评分中等的磨牙(评分 4-6)中,15 年生存率从 95%到 90%不等,而在评分较高的磨牙(评分 7-10)中,生存率从 86%到 67%不等。

结论

目前的结果表明,中重度牙周炎诊断的磨牙的牙周预后可以使用基于证据的评分指数来计算。