• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用混合效应回归分析分析韩国青少年垂直面生长模式。

Patterns of vertical facial growth in Korean adolescents analyzed with mixed-effects regression analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):810-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.016.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.016
PMID:23726331
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To understand the growth patterns of skeletal open bite and deepbite, we present observations from 9 years of pure longitudinal data based on lateral cephalometric radiographs using mixed-effects regression model analysis.

METHODS

In total, 51 children (14 years old) with extreme values for the ratio of lower anterior facial height to total anterior facial height were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a skeletal open-bite group (11 boys, 14 girls) or a skeletal deepbite group (14 boys, 12 girls). Measurements of total anterior facial height, upper anterior facial height, lower anterior facial height, total posterior facial height, ramus height, and ratio of lower anterior facial height to total anterior facial height were obtained for all subjects. All data were analyzed and interpreted using a mixed-effects regression model analysis with random effects.

RESULTS

From these 4 groups at 14 years old, statistically significant differences were observed between the groups when subjects of the same sex were compared; however, statistical significance was not reached between subjects of opposite sexes in each group. Morphologic differences were clearly evident from the start and became more pronounced with age. There were statistical significances in the initial values and increases with age in all 6 variables except for increases with age in the ratio of lower anterior facial height to total anterior facial height. Statistical significance was also reached for morphologic differences between the annual increases in the ratio of lower anterior facial height to total anterior facial height and lower anterior facial height. In general, individual random variability was high in all variables when compared with the annual changes over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Divergent patterns were established early and became more pronounced with age, with anterior facial height dimensions primarily contributing to these differences. Individual variations were so pronounced that caution is recommended for all clinical decisions.

摘要

简介

为了了解骨性开颌和深覆颌的生长模式,我们根据混合效应回归模型分析,呈现了 9 年的侧向头颅侧位片纯纵向数据的观察结果。

方法

共有 51 名儿童(14 岁)的下前颜面高度与总前颜面高度的比值为极端值,被分配到 2 个组之一:骨性开颌组(11 名男孩,14 名女孩)或骨性深覆颌组(14 名男孩,12 名女孩)。所有受试者均进行了总前颜面高度、上前颜面高度、下前颜面高度、总后颜面高度、下颌支高度和下前颜面高度与总前颜面高度比值的测量。所有数据均采用随机效应混合效应回归模型分析进行分析和解释。

结果

从这 4 个组的 14 岁儿童中,当比较同性别受试者时,观察到组间存在统计学显著差异;然而,在每个组的异性受试者中,并未达到统计学显著差异。从一开始就明显存在形态差异,且随着年龄的增长而变得更加明显。除了下前颜面高度与总前颜面高度的比值随年龄增加外,所有 6 个变量的初始值和随年龄的增加均具有统计学意义。下前颜面高度与总前颜面高度的比值和下前颜面高度的年增长率之间的形态差异也具有统计学意义。总体而言,与随时间的年变化相比,所有变量的个体随机变异性均较高。

结论

早期就建立了发散模式,且随着年龄的增长变得更加明显,前颜面高度的维度主要导致了这些差异。个体差异如此显著,因此建议在所有临床决策中都要谨慎。

相似文献

1
Patterns of vertical facial growth in Korean adolescents analyzed with mixed-effects regression analysis.采用混合效应回归分析分析韩国青少年垂直面生长模式。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):810-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.016.
2
The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.面部骨骼生长模式及其与各种常见成熟指标的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019.
3
Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.长面型的人真的有一个长的前面部吗?一项纵向研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jun;145(6):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.014.
4
Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.未经治疗的III类错牙合畸形患者颅面部生长的半纵向头影测量研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.025.
5
Diagnostic model of anterior open bite--a new way to predict skeletal type: a cross-sectional study.前牙开颌诊断模型——预测骨骼类型的新方法:一项横断面研究
Int Orthod. 2014 Sep;12(3):358-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
6
Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.9至18岁未经治疗的I类和II类女童颅面生长的比较:一项纵向研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Feb;147(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.023.
7
Mouth breathing children and cephalometric pattern: does the stage of dental development matter?口呼吸儿童与头影测量模式:牙齿发育阶段有影响吗?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;76(6):837-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.054. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
Longitudinal posteroanterior changes in transverse and vertical craniofacial structures between 10 and 14 years of age.10至14岁之间横向和垂直颅面结构的纵向前后变化。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):624-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0624:LPCITA>2.0.CO;2.
9
Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.冰岛6至16岁儿童的颅面变化——一项纵向研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Apr;28(2):152-65. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji084. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
10
Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response.使用功能性矫治器进行生长调节——成功反应的头影测量预测指标
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2013;14(1):e50-9. doi: 10.11607/ortho.917.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of hyperdivergent facial pattern and the inclination of the occlusal plane in orthodontic patients: A cross-sectional study.正畸患者中高发散型面部形态与咬合平面倾斜度的相关性:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 Jul 1;17(7):e816-e824. doi: 10.4317/jced.62910. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Palatal bone thickness for mini-implant insertion in different vertical growth patterns: a systematic review.不同垂直生长型中用于微型种植体植入的腭骨厚度:一项系统评价
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2023 Jun 29;11(2):e152. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1102-2023-152. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3
Comparison of the posterior teeth angulations in orthodontic patients with different facial growth patterns.
不同面部生长模式的正畸患者后牙角度比较。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Aug 1;15(8):e629-e634. doi: 10.4317/jced.60657. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.颅面生长与形态在交叉临床类别中的表现。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2022 Sep;305(9):2175-2206. doi: 10.1002/ar.24870. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
Geometric morphometric analysis of growth patterns among facial types.基于面型的生长模式的几何形态测量分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Sep;160(3):430-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.038. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
Sagittal and Vertical Craniofacial Growth Pattern and Timing of Circumpubertal Skeletal Maturation: A Multiple Regression Study.矢状面和垂直颅面生长模式与青春发育期骨骼成熟的时间:一项多元回归研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1728712. doi: 10.1155/2016/1728712. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
Effectiveness of the open bite treatment in growing children and adolescents. A systematic review.生长发育期儿童和青少年开颌治疗的有效性:一项系统评价
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Jun;38(3):237-50. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv048. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
8
Constancy of the angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the sella-nasion line: a nine-year longitudinal study.法兰克福水平面与蝶鞍-鼻根线夹角的稳定性:一项为期九年的纵向研究。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):286-91. doi: 10.2319/062013-464.1. Epub 2013 Sep 3.