• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部骨骼生长模式及其与各种常见成熟指标的关系。

The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.

机构信息

Center for Advanced Dental Education, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019
PMID:23726335
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sequential stages in the development of the hand, wrist, and cervical vertebrae commonly are used to assess maturation and predict the timing of the adolescent growth spurt. This approach is predicated on the idea that forecasts based on skeletal age must, of necessity, be superior to those based on chronologic age. This study was undertaken to test this reasonable, albeit largely unproved, assumption in a large, longitudinal sample.

METHODS

Serial records of 100 children (50 girls, 50 boys) were chosen from the files of the Bolton-Brush Growth Study Center in Cleveland, Ohio. The 100 series were 6 to 11 years in length, a span that was designed to encompass the onset and the peak of the adolescent facial growth spurt in each subject. Five linear cephalometric measurements (S-Na, Na-Me, PNS-A, S-Go, Go-Pog) were summed to characterize general facial size; a sixth (Co-Gn) was used to assess mandibular length. In all, 864 cephalograms were traced and analyzed. For most years, chronologic age, height, and hand-wrist films were available, thereby permitting various alternative methods of maturational assessment and prediction to be tested. The hand-wrist and the cervical vertebrae films for each time point were staged. Yearly increments of growth for stature, face, and mandible were calculated and plotted against chronologic age. For each subject, the actual age at onset and peak for stature and facial and mandibular size served as the gold standards against which key ages inferred from other methods could be compared.

RESULTS

On average, the onset of the pubertal growth spurts in height, facial size, and mandibular length occurred in girls at 9.3, 9.8, and 9.5 years, respectively. The difference in timing between height and facial size growth spurts was statistically significant. In boys, the onset for height, facial size, and mandibular length occurred more or less simultaneously at 11.9, 12.0, and 11.9 years, respectively. In girls, the peak of the growth spurt in height, facial size, and mandibular length occurred at 10.9, 11.5, and 11.5 years. Height peaked significantly earlier than both facial size and mandibular length. In boys, the peak in height occurred slightly (but statistically significantly) earlier than did the peaks in the face and mandible: 14.0, 14.4, and 14.3 years. Based on rankings, the hand-wrist stages provided the best indication (lowest root mean squared error) that maturation had advanced to the peak velocity stage. Chronologic age, however, was nearly as good, whereas the vertebral stages were consistently the worst. Errors from the use of statural onset to predict the peak of the pubertal growth spurt in height, facial size, and mandibular length were uniformly lower than for predictions based on the cervical vertebrae. Chronologic age, especially in boys, was a close second.

CONCLUSIONS

The common assumption that onset and peak occur at ages 12 and 14 years in boys and 10 and 12 years in girls seems correct for boys, but it is 6 months to 1 year late for girls. As an index of maturation, hand-wrist skeletal ages appear to offer the best indication that peak growth velocity has been reached. Of the methods tested here for the prediction of the timing of peak velocity, statural onset had the lowest errors. Although mean chronologic ages were nearly as good, stature can be measured repeatedly and thus might lead to improved prediction of the timing of the adolescent growth spurt.

摘要

简介

手部、腕部和颈椎的发育顺序通常用于评估成熟度并预测青少年生长突增的时间。这种方法的前提是,基于骨骼年龄的预测必须优于基于实际年龄的预测。本研究旨在通过大量的纵向样本检验这一合理但尚未得到充分证明的假设。

方法

从俄亥俄州克利夫兰市 Bolton-Brush 生长研究中心的档案中选择了 100 名儿童(50 名女孩,50 名男孩)的连续记录。这 100 个系列的长度为 6 到 11 年,跨度旨在涵盖每个受试者的青少年面部生长突增的开始和高峰期。五项线性头颅测量(S-Na、Na-Me、PNS-A、S-Go、Go-Pog)被汇总以描述整体面部大小;第六项(Co-Gn)用于评估下颌长度。总共追踪和分析了 864 张头颅侧位片。对于大多数年份,都有实际年龄、身高和手-腕骨片,从而可以测试各种替代的成熟度评估和预测方法。每个时间点的手-腕骨片和颈椎片都进行了分期。每年的身高、面部和下颌生长增量都被计算出来,并与实际年龄作图。对于每个受试者,身高、面部和下颌大小的实际起始年龄和峰值年龄是黄金标准,可与其他方法推断的关键年龄进行比较。

结果

平均而言,女孩的青春期生长突增在身高、面部大小和下颌长度方面分别在 9.3、9.8 和 9.5 岁开始。身高和面部大小生长突增之间的时间差异具有统计学意义。在男孩中,身高、面部大小和下颌长度的生长突增几乎同时在 11.9、12.0 和 11.9 岁开始。在女孩中,身高、面部大小和下颌长度的生长突增峰值分别在 10.9、11.5 和 11.5 岁。身高的峰值明显早于面部大小和下颌长度的峰值。在男孩中,身高的峰值略早(但具有统计学意义)于面部和下颌的峰值:14.0、14.4 和 14.3 岁。基于排名,手-腕骨片分期提供了最好的指示(最低均方根误差),表明成熟度已进入峰值速度阶段。然而,实际年龄几乎同样好,而椎体分期始终最差。使用身高起始来预测身高、面部大小和下颌长度的青春期生长突增峰值的误差比基于颈椎的预测误差要小。实际年龄,尤其是在男孩中,是非常接近的第二选择。

结论

在男孩中,12 岁和 14 岁开始和达到高峰,女孩中 10 岁和 12 岁开始和达到高峰的常见假设似乎适用于男孩,但对于女孩来说,这个时间要晚 6 个月到 1 年。作为成熟度的指标,手-腕部骨骼年龄似乎最能表明已达到生长速度的峰值。在本研究中测试的用于预测峰值速度时间的方法中,身高起始的误差最低。虽然平均实际年龄也非常接近,但身高可以多次测量,因此可能会提高对青少年生长突增时间的预测。

相似文献

1
The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.面部骨骼生长模式及其与各种常见成熟指标的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019.
2
Hand-wrist and cervical vertebral maturation indicators: how can these events be used to time Class II treatments?手腕部和颈椎成熟度指标:这些指标如何用于确定II类错颌治疗的时机?
Aust Orthod J. 2003 Nov;19(2):33-45.
3
Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.未经治疗的III类错牙合畸形患者颅面部生长的半纵向头影测量研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.025.
4
Development and testing of multilevel models for longitudinal craniofacial growth prediction.用于纵向颅面生长预测的多层次模型的开发与测试
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.035.
5
Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible. Comparisons within individuals.颅底和下颌骨的青春期快速生长。个体内部比较。
Angle Orthod. 1985 Jan;55(1):17-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1985)055<0017:PSICBA>2.0.CO;2.
6
Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height.与颈椎成熟度和身高相关的下颌骨生长
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Sep;118(3):335-40. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.107009.
7
Patterns of vertical facial growth in Korean adolescents analyzed with mixed-effects regression analysis.采用混合效应回归分析分析韩国青少年垂直面生长模式。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):810-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.016.
8
Reliability of growth prediction with hand-wrist radiographs.手腕部X光片生长预测的可靠性
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):438-42. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp015. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
9
Evaluating the agreement of skeletal age assessment based on hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae radiography.评估基于手-腕和颈椎射线摄影的骨骼年龄评估的一致性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):838-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.015.
10
Skeletal maturation and craniofacial growth.骨骼成熟与颅面生长。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Jul;98(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70029-C.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on the treatment of oral diseases in pregnant women and infants.孕妇及婴幼儿口腔疾病治疗专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Aug 29;17(1):62. doi: 10.1038/s41368-025-00395-3.
2
Growth Prediction in Orthodontics: ASystematic Review of Past Methods up to Artificial Intelligence.正畸学中的生长预测:对直至人工智能的既往方法的系统评价。
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 3;12(8):1023. doi: 10.3390/children12081023.
3
A Rare Case of Peripheral Osteoma of the Alveolar Bone of the Maxilla in a 13-Year-Old Boy.一名13岁男孩上颌牙槽骨外周骨瘤的罕见病例。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7187. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237187.
4
Predicting Mandibular Growth Potential Based on Cervical Vertebral Bone Age Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs in a Sample of the Saudi Population.在沙特人群样本中,利用头颅侧位X线片基于颈椎骨龄预测下颌生长潜力
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;14(19):2145. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192145.
5
DC-YOLOv5-based target detection algorithm for cervical vertebral maturation.基于 DC-YOLOv5 的颈椎成熟度目标检测算法。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024 Sep;47(3):1277-1290. doi: 10.1007/s13246-024-01432-x. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
6
Estimating mandibular growth stage based on cervical vertebral maturation in lateral cephalometric radiographs using artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的侧位头颅侧位片颈椎成熟度评估下颌骨生长阶段。
Prog Orthod. 2024 Jun 24;25(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40510-024-00527-1.
7
Evaluation of mandibular growth in a prepubertal Class I and Class II population: a longitudinal analysis.评价青春前期 I 类和 II 类错颌人群的下颌生长:一项纵向分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 1;46(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae014.
8
Skeletal stability of inter-molar mandibular distraction osteogenesis in growing patients.生长发育期患者下颌骨磨牙间骨段牵张成骨的稳定性。
Prog Orthod. 2024 Feb 26;25(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00507-x.
9
Mandibular Cortical Bone Evaluation in a Healthy Paediatric Population.健康儿科人群下颌骨皮质骨评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 5;11(24):3105. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243105.
10
Cephalometric comparison of mandibular growth in Brazilian children with Class II malocclusion and normal occlusion during the growth stages determined by the cervical vertebrae maturation.颈椎成熟度确定的生长阶段中,巴西骨性 II 类错颌与正常颌儿童下颌生长的头影测量比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Nov 3;28(5):e232358. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.5.e232358.oar. eCollection 2023.