Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 25;150(3):931-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 May 31.
The List of Threatening Experiences (LTE) questionnaire is frequently used to assess stressful events; however, studies of its psychometric properties are scarce. We examined the LTE's reliability, factorial structure, construct validity and explored the association between LTE scores and psychosocial variables and mental disorders.
This study involved interviewing 5442 primary care attendees from Spain. Associations between four different methods of quantifying LTE scores, psychosocial factors, major depression (CIDI), anxiety disorders (PRIME-MD), alcohol misuse and dependence (AUDIT) were measured.
The LTE showed high test-retest reliability (Kappa range=0.61-0.87) and low internal consistency (α=0.44). Tetrachoric factorial analysis yielded four factors (spousal and relational problems; employment and financial problems; personal problems; illness and bereavement in close persons). Logistic multilevel regression found a strong association between greater social support and a lower occurrence of stressful events (OR range=0.36-0.79). The association between religious-spiritual beliefs and the LTE, was weaker. The association between mental disorders and LTE scores was greater for depression (OR range=1.64-2.57) than anxiety (OR range=1.35-1.97), though the highest ORs were obtained with alcohol dependence (OR range=2.86-4.80). The ordinal score (ordinal regression) was more sensitive to detect the strength of association with mental disorders.
We are unable to distinguish the direction of the association between stressful events, psychosocial factors and mental disorders, due to our cross-sectional design of the study.
The LTE is a valid and reliable measure of stress in mental health, and the strength of association with mental disorders depends on the method of quantifying LTE scores.
威胁体验清单(LTE)问卷常用于评估应激事件,但对其心理测量学特性的研究却很少。我们检验了 LTE 的信度、因子结构、结构效度,并探讨了 LTE 评分与心理社会变量和精神障碍之间的关联。
本研究对来自西班牙的 5442 名初级保健就诊者进行了访谈。采用四种不同方法对 LTE 评分进行量化,分别为:心理社会因素、重性抑郁障碍(CIDI)、焦虑障碍(PRIME-MD)、酒精使用障碍和依赖(AUDIT)。并对它们之间的相关性进行了测量。
LTE 具有较高的重测信度(kappa 范围=0.61-0.87)和较低的内部一致性(α=0.44)。四次因子分析得出了四个因子(配偶和关系问题;就业和财务问题;个人问题;亲近的人患病和死亡)。多水平逻辑回归发现,社会支持程度越高,应激事件的发生几率越低(OR 范围=0.36-0.79)。宗教信仰与 LTE 的相关性较弱。与抑郁障碍(OR 范围=1.64-2.57)相比,精神障碍与 LTE 评分的相关性更强,焦虑障碍(OR 范围=1.35-1.97),尽管酒精依赖的 OR 值最高(OR 范围=2.86-4.80)。有序评分(有序回归)更能敏感地检测出与精神障碍的关联强度。
由于我们的研究设计是横断面的,因此我们无法区分应激事件、心理社会因素和精神障碍之间的关联方向。
LTE 是一种有效的心理健康应激测量工具,其与精神障碍的关联强度取决于 LTE 评分的量化方法。