INSERM, U1018, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France.
J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):304-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.049. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
Social inequalities in mental disorders have been described, but studies that explain these inequalities are lacking, especially those using diagnostic interviews. This study investigates the contribution of various explanatory factors to the association between educational level and major depression and generalised anxiety disorder in Irish men and women.
The study population comprised a national random sample of 5771 women and 4207 men aged 18 or more in Ireland (SLÁN 2007 survey). Major depression and generalised anxiety disorder were measured using a standardised diagnostic interview (CIDI-SF). Four groups of explanatory factors were explored: material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors, and chronic disease.
For both genders, low educational level increased the risk of both mental disorders. Material factors, especially no private health insurance, but also no car, housing tenure, insufficient food budget, and unemployment (for men), made the highest contribution (stronger for men than for women) in explaining the association between education and both mental disorders. Psychosocial (especially formal social participation, social support and marital status) and behavioural factors (smoking and physical activity for both genders, and alcohol and drug use for men) and chronic disease made low independent contributions in explaining the association between education and both mental disorders.
Given the cross-sectional study design, no causal conclusion could be drawn.
Targeting various material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors, as well as chronic diseases may help to reduce educational differences in depression and anxiety in the general population.
社会不平等在精神障碍中已经被描述,但缺乏解释这些不平等的研究,特别是那些使用诊断访谈的研究。本研究调查了各种解释因素对爱尔兰男女中教育水平与重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症之间关联的贡献。
研究人群包括爱尔兰年龄在 18 岁及以上的 5771 名女性和 4207 名男性的全国随机样本(SLÁN 2007 调查)。使用标准化诊断访谈(CIDI-SF)测量重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症。探讨了四组解释因素:物质、心理社会和行为因素以及慢性疾病。
对于男女两性,低教育水平增加了两种精神障碍的风险。物质因素,尤其是没有私人医疗保险,也没有汽车、住房所有权、食品预算不足和失业(男性),对解释教育与两种精神障碍之间的关联做出了最高的贡献(对男性的贡献强于女性)。心理社会因素(特别是正式的社会参与、社会支持和婚姻状况)和行为因素(男女两性的吸烟和体育活动,以及男性的饮酒和吸毒)以及慢性疾病对解释教育与两种精神障碍之间的关联做出了较低的独立贡献。
由于横断面研究设计,无法得出因果结论。
针对各种物质、心理社会和行为因素以及慢性疾病,可能有助于减少普通人群中抑郁和焦虑的教育差异。