• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当患者做主时:联邦拨款与联邦合格医疗中心的无偿医疗服务

When patients govern: federal grant funding and uncompensated care at federally qualified health centers.

作者信息

Wright Brad, Ricketts Thomas C

机构信息

Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 May;24(2):954-67. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0068.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2013.0068
PMID:23728059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5590367/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the proportion of consumers on federally qualified health center (FQHC) governing boards is associated with their use of federal grant funds to provide uncompensated care.

METHODS

Using FQHC data from the Uniform Data System, county-level data from the Area Resource File and governing board data from FQHC grant applications, the uncompensated care an FQHC provides relative to the amount of its federal funding is modeled as a function of board and executive committee composition using fixed-effects regression with FQHC and county-level controls.

RESULTS

Consumer governance does not predict how much uncompensated care an FQHC provides relative to the size of its federal grant. Rather, the proportion of an FQHC's patient-mix that is uninsured drives uncompensated care provision.

CONCLUSIONS

Aside from a small executive committee effect, consumer governance does not influence FQHCs' provision of uncompensated care. More work is needed to understand the role of consumer governance.

摘要

目的

确定联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)管理委员会中消费者的比例是否与其使用联邦拨款资金提供无偿医疗服务有关。

方法

利用统一数据系统中的FQHC数据、区域资源文件中的县级数据以及FQHC拨款申请中的管理委员会数据,通过固定效应回归模型,将FQHC提供的无偿医疗服务相对于其联邦资金数额建模为管理委员会和执行委员会组成的函数,并纳入FQHC和县级控制变量。

结果

消费者治理并不能预测FQHC相对于其联邦拨款规模提供的无偿医疗服务量。相反,FQHC患者组合中未参保者的比例驱动了无偿医疗服务的提供。

结论

除了执行委员会的微小影响外,消费者治理并不影响FQHC提供无偿医疗服务。需要开展更多工作来了解消费者治理的作用。

相似文献

1
When patients govern: federal grant funding and uncompensated care at federally qualified health centers.当患者做主时:联邦拨款与联邦合格医疗中心的无偿医疗服务
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 May;24(2):954-67. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0068.
2
Consumer governance may harm health center financial performance.消费者治理可能会损害健康中心的财务绩效。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Jul 1;4(3):202-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131913475818. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
3
Consumer governance and the provision of enabling services that facilitate access to care at community health centers.消费者治理和提供便利服务,以促进社区卫生中心的医疗服务可及性。
Med Care. 2012 Aug;50(8):668-75. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182551763.
4
Who governs federally qualified health centers?谁来管理合格的联邦健康中心?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Feb;38(1):27-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1898794. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
5
A long and winding road: federally qualified health centers, community variation and prospects under reform.一条漫长而曲折的道路:联邦合格健康中心、社区差异与改革前景
Res Brief. 2011 Nov(21):1-9.
6
Cardiovascular equity and health center funding: Associations of unmet hypertension and diabetes need by race/ethnicity and federal grants at federally qualified health centers, 2014-2019.心血管公平与健康中心资助:2014-2019 年,按种族/族裔和联邦拨款划分的未满足的高血压和糖尿病需求与联邦合格健康中心的关联。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310523. eCollection 2024.
7
The impact of funding for federally qualified health centers on utilization and emergency department visits in Massachusetts.联邦合格健康中心资金对马萨诸塞州利用情况和急诊就诊的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243279. eCollection 2020.
8
Perspectives. Frayed connections: can funding health centers save the safety net?
Med Health. 2000 Sep 4;54(34):suppl 1-4.
9
Perspectives. Caring for the underserved: it's a tough job and nobody has to do it.
Med Health. 2000 Aug 7;54(32):suppl 1-4.
10
Geographic access to federally qualified health centers before and after the affordable care act.平价医疗法案实施前后,获得联邦合格健康中心的地理可及性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07685-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the Impact of Medicaid Expansion and Federal Funding Cuts on FQHC Staffing and Patient Capacity.估算医疗补助计划扩大和联邦资金削减对 FQHC 人员配备和患者容量的影响。
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):504-524. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12560. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
2
Critical Incidences in U.S. Health Care Systems Experienced by Undocumented Young Adults.无证青年在美国医疗保健系统中遭遇的危急事件。
Health Equity. 2021 Sep 8;5(1):569-576. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0154. eCollection 2021.
3
Patients' Views About Patient Engagement and Representation in Healthcare Governance.患者对参与医疗保健治理和代表性的看法。
J Healthc Manag. 2019 Sep-Oct;64(5):332-346. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-18-00152.
4
Patient Engagement in Community Health Center Leadership: How Does it Happen?患者参与社区卫生中心领导:它是如何发生的?
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0523-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of sexual orientation on state legislators' behavior and priorities.性取向对州立法者行为和优先事项的影响。
J Homosex. 2009;56(8):1117-33. doi: 10.1080/00918360903279361.
2
Why do some health centers provide more enabling services than others?为什么一些健康中心提供的支持性服务比其他健康中心更多?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2):507-23. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0151.
3
Caught in the competitive crossfire: safety-net providers balance margin and mission in a profit-driven health care market.陷入竞争的交火中:在以利润为导向的医疗保健市场中,安全网提供者在利润和使命之间寻求平衡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):w374-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.w374. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
4
A comparative performance scorecard for federally funded community health centers in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州联邦资助社区卫生中心的比较绩效记分卡。
J Healthc Manag. 2007 Jan-Feb;52(1):20-31; discussion 32-3.
5
Health centers at 40: implications for future public policy.40岁时的健康中心:对未来公共政策的影响
J Ambul Care Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;28(4):357-65. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200510000-00011.
6
Survival strategies for Michigan's health care safety net providers.密歇根州医疗安全网提供者的生存策略。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Jun;40(3):923-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00392.x.
7
Exploring the limits of the safety net: community health centers and care for the uninsured.探索安全网的极限:社区健康中心与为未参保者提供的护理
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):188-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.188.
8
The health planning process: are consumers really in control?
Health Policy. 1984;4(2):117-27. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(84)90003-4.
9
Setting health priorities: community boards accurately reflect the preferences of the community's residents.确定卫生工作重点:社区委员会准确反映了社区居民的偏好。
J Community Health. 1997 Feb;22(1):57-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1025198924501.
10
Consumer participation and influence in a Health Systems Agency.消费者在卫生系统机构中的参与和影响。
J Community Health. 1981 Spring;6(3):181-93. doi: 10.1007/BF01323009.