• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知情同意作为临床试验中的一项伦理要求:一个古老但仍未解决的问题。一项评估患者对知情同意理解情况的观察性研究。

Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension.

作者信息

Sanchini Virginia, Reni Michele, Calori Giliola, Riva Elisabetta, Reichlin Massimo

机构信息

SEMM - European School of Molecular Medicine, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2014 Apr;40(4):269-75. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101115. Epub 2013 May 31.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2012-101115
PMID:23728419
Abstract

We explored the comprehension of the informed consent in 77 cancer patients previously enrolled in randomised phase II or phase III clinical trials, between March and July 2011, at the San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milano. We asked participants to complete an ad hoc questionnaire and analysed their answers. Sixty-two per cent of the patients understood the purpose and nature of the trial they were participating in; 44% understood the study procedures and 40% correctly listed at least one of the major risks or complications related to their participation in the trial. We identified three factors associated with comprehension of the informed consent: age, education and type of tumour/investigator team. We suggest several possible improvements of how to obtain informed consent that will increase patient awareness, as well as the validity and effectiveness of the clinical trials.

摘要

2011年3月至7月期间,我们在米兰的圣拉斐尔科学研究所,对77名先前参加过随机II期或III期临床试验的癌症患者对知情同意书的理解情况进行了探究。我们让参与者填写一份专门设计的问卷,并对他们的回答进行分析。62%的患者理解他们所参与试验的目的和性质;44%的患者理解研究程序,40%的患者正确列出了至少一项与参与试验相关的主要风险或并发症。我们确定了与知情同意理解相关的三个因素:年龄、教育程度以及肿瘤类型/研究者团队。我们提出了几种在获取知情同意方面可能的改进方法,这将提高患者的认知度,以及临床试验的有效性和效果。

相似文献

1
Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension.知情同意作为临床试验中的一项伦理要求:一个古老但仍未解决的问题。一项评估患者对知情同意理解情况的观察性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Apr;40(4):269-75. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101115. Epub 2013 May 31.
2
What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.我们的患者对他们的试验参与有何了解?评估患者对随机临床试验知情同意咨询的理解。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):74-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.035485. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
3
Must research participants understand randomization?研究参与者必须理解随机分组吗?
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Feb;9(2):3-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160802654145.
4
Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.阶梯楔形整群随机试验的伦理行为及报告存在不足:一项系统评价的结果
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):333-341. doi: 10.1177/1740774517703057. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
5
Randomization and the transactional framework for informed consent.随机化与知情同意的交互框架。
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Feb;9(2):16-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160802666297.
6
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of study-related patient information sheets in randomised neuro-oncology phase III-trials.随机神经肿瘤学 III 期试验中与研究相关的患者信息表的定量和定性分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
Ethical issues of informed consent in acute stroke. Analysis of the modalities of consent in 56 patients enrolled in urgent therapeutic trials.急性卒中知情同意的伦理问题。对56例参加紧急治疗试验患者的同意方式分析。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;19(2):65-8. doi: 10.1159/000083250. Epub 2005 Jan 11.
8
Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey.癌症临床试验中知情同意的质量:一项横断面调查。
Lancet. 2001 Nov 24;358(9295):1772-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06805-2.
9
Ethics in clinical research: need for assessing comprehension of informed consent form?临床研究中的伦理学:有必要评估知情同意书的理解情况吗?
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Mar;32(2):169-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
10
Evaluation of the ability of clinical research participants to comprehend informed consent form.临床研究参与者理解知情同意书能力的评估。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Sep;30(5):427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of a SIMPlified LaYered consent process on recruitment of potential participants to the Network Adaptive Platform trial: study protocol for a multicentre pragmatic nested randomised clinical trial (SIMPLY-SNAP trial).评估简化分层知情同意流程对纳入 Network Adaptive Platform 试验潜在参与者的影响:多中心实用嵌套随机临床试验(SIMPLY-SNAP 试验)的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):e083239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083239.
2
Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.参与者对临床试验中知情同意的理解:系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295784. eCollection 2024.
3
Comprehension by Caregivers and Adolescents of Clinical Trial Information Delivered via Multimedia Video Versus Conventional Practice: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
通过多媒体视频与传统方式向护理人员和青少年传达临床试验信息的理解情况:非随机对照试验。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Jun 22;6:e44252. doi: 10.2196/44252.
4
Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: A qualitative study.监护人及研究人员对马拉维城市医院儿科研究中知情同意过程的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00865-x.
5
Any progress in informed consenting for cancer treatment? Results from a cross sectional analysis at a comprehensive cancer center.癌症治疗知情同意方面有何进展?综合癌症中心的横断面分析结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul;147(7):2117-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03495-1. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
6
Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.研究知情同意中的风险与获益沟通:一项定性研究。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Sep 20;4:2333393617732017. doi: 10.1177/2333393617732017. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
7
What advanced cancer patients with limited treatment options know about clinical research: a qualitative study.晚期癌症且治疗选择有限的患者对临床研究的了解:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3235-3242. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3734-4. Epub 2017 May 9.
8
An activist's argument that participant values should guide risk-benefit ratio calculations in HIV cure research.一位活动家的观点,即参与者的价值观应指导艾滋病治愈研究中的风险效益比计算。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):100-103. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103120. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials.使用SIDCER知情同意书提高参与者在实际环境中对研究信息的理解:一项嵌套于八项临床试验的随机对照知情同意研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;73(2):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2159-1. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
10
A survey of study participants' understanding of informed consent to participate in a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture.一项关于研究参与者对参与针灸随机对照试验的知情同意理解情况的调查。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Jan 12;16:10. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0975-y.