Martin Alan J, Marottoli Richard, O'Neill Desmond
Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31(5):CD006222. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006222.pub3.
Demographic changes are leading to an increase in the number of older drivers: as dementia is an age-related disease, there is also an increase in the numbers of drivers with dementia. Dementia can impact on both the mobility and safety of drivers, and the impact of formal assessment of driving is unknown in terms of either mobility or safety. Those involved in assessment of older drivers need to be aware of the evidence of positive and negative effects of driving assessment. Cognitive tests are felt by some authors to have poor face and construct validity for assessing driving performance; extrapolating from values in one large-scale prospective cohort study, the cognitive test that most strongly predicted future crashes would, if used as a screening tool, potentially prevent six crashes per 1000 people over 65 years of age screened, but at the price of stopping the driving of 121 people who would not have had a crash.
ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia Group's Specialized Register was searched on 13 September 2012 using the terms: driving or driver* or "motor vehicle*" or "car accident*" or "traffic accident*" or automobile* or traffic. This register contains records from major healthcare databases, ongoing trial databases and grey literature sources and is updated regularly.
We sought randomised controlled trials prospectively evaluating drivers with dementia for outcomes such as transport mobility, driving cessation or motor vehicle accidents following driving assessment.
Each review author retrieved studies and assessed for primary and secondary outcomes, study design and study quality.
No studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. A description and discussion of the driving literature relating to assessment of drivers with dementia relating to the primary objectives is presented.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In an area with considerable public health impact for drivers with dementia and other road users, the available literature fails to demonstrate the benefit of driver assessment for either preserving transport mobility or reducing motor vehicle accidents. Driving legislation and recommendations from medical practitioners requires further research that addresses these outcomes in order to provide the best outcomes for both drivers with dementia and the general public.
人口结构变化导致老年驾驶员数量增加;由于痴呆症是一种与年龄相关的疾病,患有痴呆症的驾驶员数量也在增加。痴呆症会影响驾驶员的行动能力和安全,而正式驾驶评估对行动能力或安全的影响尚不清楚。参与老年驾驶员评估的人员需要了解驾驶评估的积极和消极影响的证据。一些作者认为认知测试在评估驾驶表现方面缺乏表面效度和结构效度;根据一项大型前瞻性队列研究中的数据推断,如果将最能强烈预测未来撞车事故的认知测试用作筛查工具,那么每筛查1000名65岁以上的人,可能会预防6起撞车事故,但代价是让121名不会发生撞车事故的人停止驾驶。
2012年9月13日,使用以下检索词在Cochrane痴呆症小组的专门注册库ALOIS中进行检索:driving或driver或“motor vehicle”或“car accident*”或“traffic accident*”或automobile*或traffic。该注册库包含来自主要医疗保健数据库、正在进行的试验数据库和灰色文献来源的记录,并定期更新。
我们寻找前瞻性评估痴呆症驾驶员在驾驶评估后的交通出行能力、停止驾驶或机动车事故等结局的随机对照试验。
每位综述作者检索研究并评估主要和次要结局、研究设计和研究质量。
未找到符合纳入标准的研究。本文介绍并讨论了与痴呆症驾驶员评估相关的驾驶文献,涉及主要目标。
在一个对痴呆症驾驶员和其他道路使用者有重大公共卫生影响的领域,现有文献未能证明驾驶评估在保持交通出行能力或减少机动车事故方面的益处。驾驶立法和医生的建议需要进一步研究以解决这些结局问题,从而为痴呆症驾驶员和公众提供最佳结果。