Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Konnevesi Research Station, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland,
Oecologia. 2013 Dec;173(4):1227-35. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2691-y. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
The relationship between predators and prey is thought to change due to habitat loss and fragmentation, but patterns regarding the direction of the effect are lacking. The common prediction is that specialized predators, often more dependent on a certain habitat type, should be more vulnerable to habitat loss compared to generalist predators, but actual fragmentation effects are unknown. If a predator is small and vulnerable to predation by other larger predators through intra-guild predation, habitat fragmentation will similarly affect both the prey and the small predator. In this case, the predator is predicted to behave similarly to the prey and avoid open and risky areas. We studied a specialist predator's, the least weasel, Mustela nivalis nivalis, spacing behavior and hunting efficiency on bank voles, Myodes glareolus, in an experimentally fragmented habitat. The habitat consisted of either one large habitat patch (non-fragmented) or four small habitat patches (fragmented) with the same total area. The study was replicated in summer and autumn during a year with high avian predation risk for both voles and weasels. As predicted, weasels under radio-surveillance killed more voles in the non-fragmented habitat which also provided cover from avian predators during their prey search. However, this was only during autumn, when the killing rate was also generally high due to cold weather. The movement areas were the same for both sexes and both fragmentation treatments, but weasels of both sexes were more prone to take risks in crossing the open matrix in the fragmented treatment. Our results support the hypothesis that habitat fragmentation may increase the persistence of specialist predator and prey populations if predators are limited in the same habitat as their prey and they share the same risk from avian predation.
捕食者与猎物之间的关系被认为会因栖息地丧失和破碎化而发生变化,但关于影响方向的模式却缺乏研究。普遍的预测是,与一般的捕食者相比,专门捕食者通常更依赖于某种特定的栖息地类型,因此更容易受到栖息地丧失的影响,但实际的破碎化效应尚不清楚。如果一种捕食者体型较小,并且容易受到同种或其他较大捕食者的捕食(种内捕食),那么栖息地破碎化也会对猎物和小型捕食者产生类似的影响。在这种情况下,捕食者的行为可能与猎物类似,避免开阔和高风险的区域。我们研究了一种专门捕食者——伶鼬(Mustela nivalis nivalis),它以林姬鼠(Myodes glareolus)为食,在一个实验性的破碎化栖息地中,研究了伶鼬的空间分布行为和猎食效率。栖息地由一个大的栖息地斑块(非破碎化)或四个小的栖息地斑块(破碎化)组成,总栖息地面积相同。该研究在一年中的夏季和秋季进行了重复,此时鸟类捕食者对林姬鼠和伶鼬都有很高的捕食风险。正如预测的那样,在无线电监测下,处于非破碎化栖息地的伶鼬在猎食时会杀死更多的林姬鼠,因为非破碎化栖息地为它们提供了躲避鸟类捕食者的掩护。然而,这种情况仅在秋季出现,因为寒冷的天气导致捕杀率普遍较高。无论在性别还是在破碎化处理方面,雄性和雌性伶鼬的活动区域都是相同的,但在破碎化处理中,它们更倾向于冒险穿越开阔的基质。我们的研究结果支持了这样一种假设,即如果捕食者与猎物在同一栖息地受到限制,并且它们面临相同的来自鸟类捕食者的风险,那么栖息地破碎化可能会增加专门捕食者和猎物种群的持久性。