Lammi Biological Station, University of Helsinki, Pääjärventie 320, Lammi, Finland.
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jul;81(4):747-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01956.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
1. Although the intrinsic habitat preferences of a species can be considered to be fixed, the realized habitat use depends on the prevailing abiotic and biotic conditions. Often the core habitats are occupied by dense and stable populations, while marginal habitats become occupied only at times of high density. In a community of interacting species, habitat uses of different species become inter-related, for example an increased density of a strong competitor forcing a weaker competitor to use more marginal habitats. 2. We studied the spatio-temporal distribution patterns of three common small mammal species, the bank vole Myodes glareolus; the field vole Microtus agrestis; and the common shrew Sorex araneus, in a 4-year trapping study carried out on six large islands, each containing a mixture of three main habitat types (forest, field and clear-cut). We experimentally released least weasels (Mustela n. nivalis) to some of the islands to see how the focal species respond to increased predation pressure. 3. Both vole species were largely restricted to their core habitats (bank voles to forests and field voles to fields) at times of low population density. With increasing density, the relative habitat use of both species increased in the clear-cut areas. The common shrew was a generalist in its habitat use at all population densities. 4. The release of the weasels changed the habitat use of all study species. 5. The vole species showed a stronger aggregated pattern than the common shrew, especially at low population density. The vole aggregations remained in the same localities between seasons, except in the case of bank voles after the weasels were released. 6. Bank voles and field voles avoided each other at high density. 7. We conclude that intrinsically differential habitat requirements and flexibility to modify habitat use facilitate the coexistence of the two competing vole species in mosaic landscapes consisting of boreal forests and open habitats.
虽然物种的固有栖息地偏好可以被认为是固定的,但实际的栖息地利用取决于流行的非生物和生物条件。通常,核心栖息地被密集和稳定的种群占据,而边缘栖息地只有在高密度时才会被占据。在一个相互作用的物种群落中,不同物种的栖息地利用变得相互关联,例如,一个强大的竞争者的密度增加会迫使一个较弱的竞争者利用更多的边缘栖息地。
我们在一项为期 4 年的捕鼠研究中,在六个大型岛屿上进行了研究,每个岛屿都包含三种主要栖息地类型(森林、田野和采伐区)的混合。我们实验性地向一些岛屿释放了伶鼬(Mustela n. nivalis),以观察焦点物种对增加的捕食压力的反应。
在低种群密度时,两种田鼠物种主要局限于它们的核心栖息地(林栖田鼠在森林中,草原田鼠在田野中)。随着密度的增加,两种物种在采伐区的相对栖息地利用增加。普通鼩鼱在所有种群密度下都是栖息地利用的多面手。
伶鼬的释放改变了所有研究物种的栖息地利用。
与普通鼩鼱相比,田鼠物种表现出更强的聚集模式,尤其是在低密度时。田鼠聚集在同一地点之间的季节,除了在伶鼬释放后林栖田鼠的情况。
林栖田鼠和草原田鼠在高密度时相互回避。
我们得出结论,内在的差异栖息地需求和灵活修改栖息地利用有助于在由北方森林和开阔栖息地组成的镶嵌景观中,两种竞争的田鼠物种共存。