• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠脉综合征患者早期双联或三联抗血小板治疗与晚期双联或三联抗血小板治疗的临床结局、卫生资源利用和成本。

Clinical outcomes, health resource use, and cost in patients with early versus late dual or triple anti-platelet treatment for acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

DataMed Solutions LLC, 4660 Stonehill Street, Hilliard, OH 43026, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Aug;13(4):273-83. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0026-3.

DOI:10.1007/s40256-013-0026-3
PMID:23728829
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) guidelines recommend early dual anti-platelet therapy (thienopyridines + acetylsalicylic acid [aspirin]). However, triple therapy (thienopyridines + aspirin + glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors [GRIs]) has shown benefit in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed real-world ACS treatment patterns and outcomes in the acute care setting.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of patients admitted to hospital with ACS (index event) from January 2007 to December 2009 was conducted (Thomson's MarketScan Hospital Drug Database).

PATIENTS

Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age, of either sex, and had primary admission and discharge diagnoses of ACS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cohorts were defined by anti-platelet treatment and then by the timing of treatment initiation (early initiation: within ≤2 days of admission; late initiation: ≥2 days post-admission). Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, resource utilization, and costs were assessed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 249,907 eligible patients were placed into four treatment cohorts (aspirin assumed for all patients): aspirin only; clopidogrel only (dual therapy); GRI only (dual therapy); and clopidogrel + GRI (triple therapy). Patients in the 'clopidogrel-only' cohort were more likely to be older, female, and have more co-morbidities than those in other cohorts; stroke (6.2 %) and re-hospitalization (15.4 %) rates were higher than in the 'GRI-only' and 'triple therapy' cohorts. The GRI-only cohort had higher major bleeding rates (3.3 %), mortality (7.6 %), and costs ($US21,975 [year 2010 values]) than the clopidogrel-only and triple-therapy cohorts. Late initiation cohorts were more likely to be older, female, and have more co-morbidities than early initiation cohorts. Major bleeding was more likely with GRI-only patients (regardless of initiation timing) than with other cohorts. Late-treated clopidogrel-only patients had higher rates of stroke (6.9 %), ACS-related re-admissions (6.1 %), and all-cause re-admissions (15.9 %) than other cohorts. Late treatment was associated with longer length of stay and significantly higher costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world anti-platelet treatment patterns are consistent with ACS guidelines recommending early initiation and selective GRI use. In contrast to recommendations, some outcomes were improved with triple therapy compared with dual therapy.

摘要

背景

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)指南建议早期双联抗血小板治疗(噻吩吡啶类+乙酰水杨酸[阿司匹林])。然而,临床试验表明三联治疗(噻吩吡啶类+阿司匹林+糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 受体抑制剂[GRI])有益。

目的

本研究评估了急性护理环境中 ACS 的真实世界治疗模式和结局。

研究设计

对 2007 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月因 ACS(索引事件)住院的患者进行了回顾性分析(Thomson 的 MarketScan 医院药物数据库)。

患者

符合条件的患者年龄≥18 岁,无论性别,均有 ACS 的主要入院和出院诊断。

结局指标

根据抗血小板治疗和治疗开始时间(早期开始:入院≤2 天内;晚期开始:入院后≥2 天)将队列定义。使用描述性统计方法评估患者特征、临床结局、资源利用和成本。

结果

共有 249907 名符合条件的患者被分为四个治疗队列(假定所有患者均使用阿司匹林):阿司匹林单药治疗;氯吡格雷单药治疗(双联治疗);GRI 单药治疗(双联治疗);氯吡格雷+GRI(三联治疗)。与其他队列相比,“氯吡格雷单药”队列的患者更有可能年龄较大、女性且合并症更多;与“GRI 单药”和“三联治疗”队列相比,该队列的卒中(6.2%)和再住院(15.4%)发生率更高。GRI 单药治疗队列的大出血发生率(3.3%)、死亡率(7.6%)和费用(2010 年美元 21975 美元)均高于氯吡格雷单药和三联治疗队列。与早期开始队列相比,晚期开始队列的患者年龄更大、女性更多且合并症更多。与其他队列相比,GRI 单药治疗患者更易发生大出血(无论起始时间如何)。与其他队列相比,晚期治疗的氯吡格雷单药治疗患者卒中(6.9%)、ACS 相关再入院(6.1%)和全因再入院(15.9%)发生率更高。晚期治疗与住院时间延长和显著更高的费用相关。

结论

真实世界的抗血小板治疗模式符合 ACS 指南建议的早期开始和选择性 GRI 使用。与建议相反,与双联治疗相比,三联治疗在某些结局方面有所改善。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes, health resource use, and cost in patients with early versus late dual or triple anti-platelet treatment for acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征患者早期双联或三联抗血小板治疗与晚期双联或三联抗血小板治疗的临床结局、卫生资源利用和成本。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Aug;13(4):273-83. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0026-3.
2
Predictors, cost, and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome who receive optimal secondary prevention therapy: results from the antiplatelet treatment observational registries (APTOR).急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受最佳二级预防治疗的预测因素、成本和结局:抗血小板治疗观察性注册研究(APTOR)的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;170(2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.057. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
3
Impact of dyspnea on medical utilization and affiliated costs in patients with acute coronary syndrome.呼吸困难对急性冠状动脉综合征患者医疗利用及相关费用的影响。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Aug;39(3):16-22. doi: 10.3810/hp.2011.08.575.
4
Utilization of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Australian practice.澳大利亚实践中基于证据的疗法在急性冠状动脉综合征二级预防中的应用。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Dec;33(6):591-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00950.x.
5
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in acute coronary syndrome: incidence, cost impact, and acute clopidogrel interruption.急性冠状动脉综合征中的冠状动脉搭桥手术:发生率、成本影响及氯吡格雷急性中断情况
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Feb;40(1):15-23. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.02.944.
6
Cost-effectiveness of 12-month treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征 12 个月的成本效果比较。
Clin Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1110-1117.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
7
Elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes managed without revascularization: insights into the safety of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with reduced-dose prasugrel versus standard-dose clopidogrel.未进行血运重建治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征老年患者:探讨长期应用小剂量普拉格雷双联抗血小板治疗与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比的安全性。
Circulation. 2013 Aug 20;128(8):823-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002303. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
8
Economic evaluation of clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients without ST-segment elevation in Greece: a cost-utility analysis.希腊无 ST 段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者氯吡格雷的经济学评价:成本-效用分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jul 1;10(4):261-71. doi: 10.2165/11633820-000000000-00000.
9
Antiplatelet intervention in acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征的抗血小板治疗。
Am J Ther. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):e29-40. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31804c7238.
10
Discharge aspirin dose and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: an analysis from the TRITON-TIMI 38 study (trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38).普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的阿司匹林剂量与临床结局:来自 TRITON-TIMI 38 研究的分析(评估通过优化血小板抑制作用改善治疗结局的试验,普拉格雷-心肌梗死溶栓 38)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 28;63(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.023. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing pre-discharge interventions to reduce length of stay for older adults: A scoping review.确定减少老年人住院时间的出院前干预措施:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0318233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318233. eCollection 2025.
2
Initiation And Persistence With Antiplatelet Agents Among The Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Retrospective, Observational Database Study In China.急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板药物的起始使用与持续使用情况:一项在中国进行的回顾性观察性数据库研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Dec 17;13:2159-2169. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S228065. eCollection 2019.
3
An agent-based model of the response to angioplasty and bare-metal stent deployment in an atherosclerotic blood vessel.
一种基于代理的动脉粥样硬化血管中血管成形术和裸金属支架植入反应模型。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 14;9(4):e94411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094411. eCollection 2014.