Garcia Emily, Hass Zachary J
School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.
Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0318233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318233. eCollection 2025.
Hospital pre-discharge interventions are becoming one of the leading strategies to promote early discharge. For older adult patients, it remains unclear what these interventions are and how they affect discharge outcomes.
This scoping review categorizes pre-discharge interventions promoting early acute care hospital discharging or total hospital length of stay reductions among older adults, synthesizes contextual factors (e.g., cost, staffing) driving implementation, and assesses the perceived intervention's impact.
The review followed the five states of the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR extension. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched from 1983 to 2020 for pre-discharge interventions designed or adapted to discharge older adults earlier in their stay from acute care hospitals. Potentially relevant articles were screened against eligibility criteria. Findings were extracted and collated in data charting forms followed by brief thematic analyses.
The search yielded 5,455 articles of which 91 articles were included. Eight pre-discharge intervention categories were identified: clinical management, diagnostic/risk assessment tools, staffing enhancements, drug administration, length of stay protocols, nutrition planning, and communication improvements. Leading motivations for intervention implementation included the nationwide drive to reduce care costs and hospitals' need to increase hospital profitability, improve quality of care, or optimize resource utilization. Discharge outcomes reported included hospitalization costs, readmission rates, mortality rates, resource utilization rates and costs, and length of stay. Mixed results were found regarding the effectiveness of early discharge interventions on discharge outcomes based on expressed author sentiment.
The drive for pre-discharge interventions that reduce older adult hospital stays and associated costs continues to stem primarily from economic and governmental policies. Follow-up studies may be required to emphasize patient perspectives and care trajectories to avoid unintentional costly and health-deteriorating consequences.
医院出院前干预正成为促进早期出院的主要策略之一。对于老年患者而言,这些干预措施具体是什么以及它们如何影响出院结果仍不明确。
本范围综述对促进老年患者早期从急症医院出院或缩短住院总时长的出院前干预措施进行分类,综合推动实施的背景因素(如成本、人员配备),并评估这些干预措施的预期影响。
本综述遵循了阿克西和奥马利框架的五个阶段以及PRISMA-ScR扩展版。检索了1983年至2020年期间的PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库,以查找旨在或经调整以促使老年患者在急症医院住院期间更早出院的出院前干预措施。根据纳入标准对潜在相关文章进行筛选。提取研究结果并整理成数据图表形式,随后进行简要的主题分析。
检索共获得5455篇文章,其中91篇文章被纳入。确定了八类出院前干预措施:临床管理、诊断/风险评估工具、人员配备增强、药物管理、住院时长方案、营养规划以及沟通改善。干预措施实施的主要动机包括全国范围内降低护理成本的推动,以及医院提高盈利能力、改善护理质量或优化资源利用的需求。报告的出院结果包括住院费用、再入院率、死亡率、资源利用率和成本以及住院时长。根据作者表达的观点,早期出院干预措施对出院结果的有效性存在不同结果。
减少老年患者住院时长及相关成本的出院前干预措施的推动主要仍源于经济和政府政策。可能需要开展后续研究以强调患者视角和护理轨迹,以避免产生意外的高成本和健康恶化后果。