• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)TG18协议对软拷贝显示系统进行性能评估。

Performance evaluation of soft copy display systems according to AAPM TG18 protocol.

作者信息

Olgar T, Kamberli E

机构信息

Department of Engineering Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Ankara University, 06100 Tandoğan, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2013 Jun;36(2):231-41. doi: 10.1007/s13246-013-0203-3. Epub 2013 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1007/s13246-013-0203-3
PMID:23729181
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the display performance of the liquid crystal display monitors according to the American association of physicists in medicine task group 18 (AAPM TG18) protocol at prior and after new calibration. We measured minimum and maximum luminance, luminance ratio, luminance and contrast response, luminance angular and spatial dependency, resolution, veiling glare and chromaticity quantitatively for 33 medical displays. Display noise was evaluated only visually. The mean maximum luminance and luminance ratio were 386 and 273 cd m(-2), respectively. The mean deviation of measured luminance and contrast response from expected response associated with the digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) grayscale standard display function (GSDF) were 9.76 and 2.35 % at prior calibration and 1.23 and 0.26 % after recalibration, respectively. In luminance uniformity test the mean maximum luminance deviation was 16 %. Luminance method was used in the spatial resolution test and the mean percent luminance difference was 12 % at the center. The mean glare ratio was 1 154. The average color uniformity parameter across the display area of each display device was 0.0093. Majority of the test results were in good agreement with the criteria recommended by AAPM TG18 report. Considerable improvement was observed in display luminance and contrast response with respect to expected response of DICOM GSDF after new calibration for some displays.

摘要

本研究的目的是根据美国医学物理师协会任务组18(AAPM TG18)协议,评估新型校准前后液晶显示器的显示性能。我们对33台医用显示器的最小和最大亮度、亮度比、亮度和对比度响应、亮度角度和空间依赖性、分辨率、遮蔽眩光和色度进行了定量测量。仅通过视觉评估显示噪声。平均最大亮度和亮度比分别为386和273 cd m(-2)。在校准前,测量的亮度和对比度响应与医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)灰度标准显示功能(GSDF)预期响应的平均偏差分别为9.76%和2.35%,重新校准后分别为1.23%和0.26%。在亮度均匀性测试中,平均最大亮度偏差为16%。空间分辨率测试采用亮度法,中心位置的平均亮度百分比差异为12%。平均眩光比为1 154。每个显示设备显示区域的平均颜色均匀性参数为0.0093。大多数测试结果与AAPM TG18报告推荐的标准高度一致。对于一些显示器,在新型校准后,观察到显示亮度和对比度响应相对于DICOM GSDF预期响应有显著改善。

相似文献

1
Performance evaluation of soft copy display systems according to AAPM TG18 protocol.根据美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)TG18协议对软拷贝显示系统进行性能评估。
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2013 Jun;36(2):231-41. doi: 10.1007/s13246-013-0203-3. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
2
Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.基于美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)TG 18验收协议的平板液晶显示器主要类别显示性能评估。
Med Phys. 2004 Jul;31(7):2155-64. doi: 10.1118/1.1764946.
3
Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.医学成像系统显示性能评估:AAPM TG18报告执行摘要
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1205-25. doi: 10.1118/1.1861159.
4
Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays.医用液晶显示器的视角性能
Med Phys. 2006 Mar;33(3):645-54. doi: 10.1118/1.2168430.
5
The effect of time in use on the display performance of the iPad.使用时间对iPad显示性能的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20150657. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150657. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.在进行了 DICOM 灰度标准显示校准后,LCD 的性能仍然存在差异。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):181-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2851.
7
Luminance and contrast performance of liquid crystal displays for mammographic applications.用于乳腺X线摄影的液晶显示器的亮度和对比度性能。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Oct;3(5):429-36. doi: 10.1177/153303460400300503.
8
Digital display monitor performance in general dental practice.普通牙科诊所中数字显示监视器的性能
Aust Dent J. 2015 Jun;60(2):240-6. doi: 10.1111/adj.12327. Epub 2015 May 20.
9
Grayscale calibration and quality assurance of diagnostic monitors in a PACS system.PACS系统中诊断监视器的灰度校准与质量保证
Radiol Med. 2006 Sep;111(6):863-75. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0081-9. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
10
Technical Performance Assessment and Quality Control of Ultrasound Device Monitors.超声设备监视器的技术性能评估和质量控制。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023 Jan;49(1):380-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Oct 22.