Suppr超能文献

内镜手术的创新——走进未来的过去:是否要搭上单孔腹腔镜手术的潮流?

Innovations in Endosurgery-Journey into the Past of the Future: To Ride the SILS Bandwagon or Not?

作者信息

Agarwal Brij B, Ali Kamran, Goyal Karan, Mahajan Krishan C

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060 India ; Dr. Agarwal's Surgery & Yoga, F-81&F-82, Street 4, Virender Nagar, Janakpuri, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg. 2012 Jun;74(3):234-41. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0583-8. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

Abstract

Progress in surgical practice has paralleled the civilizational evolution. Surgery has progressed from being the last resort in saving life to being form and function preserver. Post-renaissance Industrial age gave an impetus to this march of surgery. The currently on going digital technological revolution has further catalysed this march. Having achieved the stabilized and acceptable clinical outcomes, the surgeon has embarked on a journey of improving patient reported outcomes (PRO). Improvement in PROs with the advent of laparoscopic surgery with the attendant emphasis on minimising invasion has led to debates about invasion being just parietal or holistic in physiological sense. There is a concern that parietal invasiveness shouldn't be a trade-off for compromised clinical outcomes. Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in its current avatar with current instrumentation seems to be an enthusiastic bandwagon rolling on with the cosmetic benefits acting as veil to hide the potential clinical concerns. History of surgical innovations is riddled with tales of vindictiveness and vicissitude. Lest the same fate befalls SILS we would do better to examine the SILS bandwagon in its current form till the emerging technologies address the current concerns.

摘要

外科实践的进步与文明的演进并行。外科手术已从挽救生命的最后手段发展成为形态和功能的维护者。文艺复兴后的工业时代推动了外科手术的这一发展进程。当前正在进行的数字技术革命进一步加速了这一进程。在实现了稳定且可接受的临床结果后,外科医生开始踏上改善患者报告结局(PRO)的征程。随着腹腔镜手术的出现,PRO得到改善,同时强调尽量减少侵袭,这引发了关于侵袭在生理意义上只是局部的还是整体的争论。有人担心,不应以牺牲临床结果为代价来换取局部侵袭性的降低。当前形式下配备现有器械的单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)似乎是一股热情高涨的潮流,其美容优势掩盖了潜在的临床问题。外科创新的历史充满了报复和变迁的故事。以免SILS遭遇同样的命运,我们最好审视一下当前形式下的SILS潮流,直到新兴技术解决当前的问题。

相似文献

1
Innovations in Endosurgery-Journey into the Past of the Future: To Ride the SILS Bandwagon or Not?
Indian J Surg. 2012 Jun;74(3):234-41. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0583-8. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
3
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases.
Indian J Surg. 2012 Feb;74(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0372-9. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
4
Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it.
J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Jan;7(1):28-32. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72372.
5
Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Aug;20(4):191-204. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a teaching procedure: a single-center experience of more than 2100 procedures.
Surg Today. 2016 Nov;46(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1315-7. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
9
Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1478-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
10
Application of single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomies in patients with complicated appendicitis.
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010 Dec;26(6):388-94. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.388. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Mentoring in Surgery-Mentor, Parshuram, Dronacharya, Krishan.
Indian J Surg. 2018 Feb;80(1):81-83. doi: 10.1007/s12262-017-1689-9. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Practice of Surgery-Decision, Precision, Incision.
Indian J Surg. 2017 Dec;79(6):483-485. doi: 10.1007/s12262-017-1711-2. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Even Handed Future of Surgery-Ambidextrous, Serious Gamers with Innate Left Hand Laterality.
Indian J Surg. 2016 Dec;78(6):509-510. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1514-x. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
Why the Resistance: Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Saving the Patient from Tigers.
Indian J Surg. 2016 Dec;78(6):431-434. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1568-9. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
Cashless, Tech-Savvy Future Surgeon.
Indian J Surg. 2016 Jun;78(3):171-2. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1513-y. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
6
Fast Track Surgery-Minimizing Side Effects of Surgery.
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):753-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1451-8. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
Biomolecular inflammatory response to surgical energy usage in laparoscopic surgery: results of a randomized study.
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1733-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4408-2. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
9
Esophagectomy: anastomotic leak, stent the rent!
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):1-4. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.126304.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient views through the keyhole: new perspectives on single-incision vs. multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Apr;14(4):242-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00435.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
2
'Extreme' vasculobiliary injuries: association with fundus-down cholecystectomy in severely inflamed gallbladders.
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Jan;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00393.x. Epub 2011 Oct 23.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do patients care?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):535-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1785-2. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
4
Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Br J Surg. 2011 Dec;98(12):1695-702. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7689. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
5
Reminder of the metrics of endosurgical innovation.
Arch Surg. 2011 Sep;146(9):1108. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.199.
6
Surgical wisdom.
Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):3-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7688. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
7
Chasing zero: the drive to eliminate surgical site infections.
Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):430-6; discussion 436-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822cc0ad.
8
Bile duct injury after single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):587-91. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466008646.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验