Froghi Farid, Sodergren Mikael Hans, Darzi Ara, Paraskeva Paraskevas
Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, UK.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Aug;20(4):191-204. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6.
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) aims to eliminate multiple port incisions. Although general operative principles of SILS are similar to conventional laparoscopic surgery, operative techniques are not standardized. This review aims to evaluate the current use of SILS published in the literature by examining the types of operations performed, techniques employed, and relevant complications and morbidity. This review considered a total of 94 studies reporting 1889 patients evaluating 17 different general surgical operations. There were 8 different access techniques reported using conventional laparoscopic instruments and specifically designed SILS ports. There is extensive heterogeneity associated with operating methods and in particular ways of overcoming problems with retraction and instrumentation. Published complications, morbidity, and hospital length of stay are comparable to conventional laparoscopy. Although SILS provides excellent cosmetic results and morbidity seems similar to conventional laparoscopy, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of this novel technique.
单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)旨在消除多个切口。虽然SILS的一般手术原则与传统腹腔镜手术相似,但手术技术尚未标准化。本综述旨在通过检查所进行的手术类型、采用的技术以及相关并发症和发病率,评估文献中SILS的当前应用情况。本综述共纳入94项研究,报告了1889例患者,评估了17种不同的普通外科手术。使用传统腹腔镜器械和专门设计的SILS端口报告了8种不同的入路技术。手术方法,特别是克服牵拉和器械操作问题的方法存在广泛的异质性。已发表的并发症、发病率和住院时间与传统腹腔镜手术相当。虽然SILS提供了出色的美容效果,且发病率似乎与传统腹腔镜手术相似,但仍需要更大规模的随机对照试验来评估这项新技术的安全性和有效性。