Zeplin Philip H, Henle M, Zahn R K, Meffert R H, Schmidt K
Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wuerzburg University Hospital, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
J Hand Microsurg. 2012 Jun;4(1):16-20. doi: 10.1007/s12593-012-0063-1. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
The purpose of this study was to compare two sutures; a knotted polydioxane with a knotless barbed in a 4-strand Kirchmayr-Kessler suture technique. Human flexor digitorum tendons were separated into four groups. Group 1 - polydioxane; Group 2 - barbed suture; Group 3 and 4 - same as group 1 and 2 with an additional peripheral running suture. In each group the repaired tendons were subjected to linear and cyclical loads. No difference in maximum tensile strength after linear and cyclical force could be detected between the knotted polydioxane suture and the knotless barbed suture. On linear force tests an additional circumferential repair increased the maximum tensile strength of both sutures. Cyclical force loading did not lead to a reduction of maximum strength. Following linear and cyclical loading the 4-strand barbed suture achieved maximum tensile strengths comparable to the 4-strand repair using the polydioxane suture. Barbed suture repair may offer the advantage of knotless suture techniques.
本研究的目的是在四股Kirchmayr-Kessler缝合技术中比较两种缝线;一种是打结的聚二氧六环缝线,另一种是无结倒刺缝线。将人指浅屈肌腱分为四组。第1组——聚二氧六环缝线;第2组——倒刺缝线;第3组和第4组——与第1组和第2组相同,但额外加了周边连续缝合。在每组中,对修复后的肌腱施加线性和周期性负荷。在施加线性和周期性力后,打结的聚二氧六环缝线和无结倒刺缝线之间未检测到最大抗张强度的差异。在线性力测试中,额外的环周修复增加了两种缝线的最大抗张强度。周期性力加载并未导致最大强度降低。在进行线性和周期性加载后,四股倒刺缝线的最大抗张强度与使用聚二氧六环缝线进行的四股修复相当。倒刺缝线修复可能具有无结缝合技术的优势。