• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于屈肌腱修复的带倒刺缝线构型的体外比较

In Vitro Comparison of Two Barbed Suture Configurations for Flexor Tendon Repair.

作者信息

Engel Jamie L, Gabra Joseph N, Esterle Andrew R, Lanzinger William D, Elias John J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio, United States.

Department of Research, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio, United States.

出版信息

J Hand Microsurg. 2017 Dec;9(3):126-130. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606628. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1606628
PMID:29302136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5741403/
Abstract

The current study compares the strength of a previously studied technique for flexor tendon repair with barbed sutures to an experimental approach that aligns all the barbs to oppose distraction.  Twelve flexor tendons from cadaveric specimens were mechanically tested following repair of simulated zone II tendon injuries. Two repair techniques utilizing barbed sutures were studied: the Marrero-Amadeo four-core barbed suture approach and the experimental configuration with all barbs on four cores opposing distraction. Maximum applied load at failure, that is, ultimate load, and 2-mm gap force were compared between the two repair techniques, both as raw values and after normalization to cross-sectional area of the intact tendon. Statistical testing was performed using -tests and Mann-Whitney -tests, where appropriate, with a significance level of 0.05.  The ultimate loads, raw (58.2 N) and normalized (4.8 N/mm ), were significantly larger for the Marrero-Amadeo repair than the proposed experimental approach (35.6 N and 2.7 N/mm ;  < 0.05). No significant differences were identified for 2-mm gap force.  The innovation of suturing to align all barbs to oppose distraction does not improve strength of the repaired tendon. The Marrero-Amadeo technique was found to have superior strength for use in traumatic zone II flexor tendon injuries.

摘要

本研究将先前研究的使用带倒刺缝线修复屈指肌腱的技术强度与一种使所有倒刺对齐以对抗牵张的实验方法进行了比较。对12条来自尸体标本的屈指肌腱进行模拟Ⅱ区肌腱损伤修复后的力学测试。研究了两种使用带倒刺缝线的修复技术:马雷罗 - 阿马德奥四芯带倒刺缝线法和所有倒刺在四个芯上对抗牵张的实验构型。比较了两种修复技术在失效时的最大施加负荷(即极限负荷)和2毫米间隙力,包括原始值和根据完整肌腱横截面积归一化后的值。在适当情况下,使用t检验和曼 - 惠特尼U检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为0.05。马雷罗 - 阿马德奥修复法的极限负荷,原始值(58.2 N)和归一化值(4.8 N/mm²),显著大于所提出的实验方法(35.6 N和2.7 N/mm²;P < 0.05)。在2毫米间隙力方面未发现显著差异。使所有倒刺对齐以对抗牵张的缝合创新方法并不能提高修复肌腱的强度。发现马雷罗 - 阿马德奥技术在创伤性Ⅱ区屈指肌腱损伤修复中具有更强的强度。

相似文献

1
In Vitro Comparison of Two Barbed Suture Configurations for Flexor Tendon Repair.两种用于屈肌腱修复的带倒刺缝线构型的体外比较
J Hand Microsurg. 2017 Dec;9(3):126-130. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606628. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
2
A Mechanical Evaluation of Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair Using a Knotless Barbed Suture Versus a Traditional Braided Suture.使用无结倒刺缝线与传统编织缝线对Ⅱ区屈肌腱修复进行的力学评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
3
Performance of a knotless four-strand flexor tendon repair with a unidirectional barbed suture device: a dynamic ex vivo comparison.使用单向带倒刺缝合装置进行无结四股屈肌腱修复的性能:动态体外比较
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Jan;39(1):30-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193413476607. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
4
A barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbs.一种用于屈肌腱的带倒刺缝线修复术:一种无外露倒刺的新技术。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Nov 7;2(10):e237. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203. eCollection 2014 Oct.
5
Asymmetric 6-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair - Biomechanical Analysis Using Barbed Suture.不对称6股屈肌腱修复——使用倒刺缝线的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019 Sep;24(3):297-302. doi: 10.1142/S2424835519500371.
6
The Impact of Suture Caliber and Looped Configurations on the Suture-Tendon Interface in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.缝线直径和环形构型对Ⅱ区屈肌腱修复中缝线-肌腱界面的影响
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Feb;44(2):156.e1-156.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
7
Biomechanical analysis of knotless flexor tendon repair using large-diameter unidirection barbed suture.使用大直径单向带倒刺缝线进行无结屈肌腱修复的生物力学分析
Hand (N Y). 2013 Sep;8(3):315-9. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9491-4.
8
Comparison of Barbed Sutures in Porcine Flexor Tenorrhaphy.倒刺缝线在猪屈肌腱缝合术中的比较
Hand (N Y). 2016 Dec;11(4):475-478. doi: 10.1177/1558944715626928. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
9
Barbed suture vs conventional tenorrhaphy: biomechanical analysis in an animal model.倒刺缝线与传统肌腱缝合术:动物模型中的生物力学分析
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Sep;16(3):251-7. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0333-8. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Flexor tendons repair: effect of core sutures caliber with increased number of suture strands and peripheral sutures. A sheep model.屈肌腱修复:缝线芯直径对缝线股数增加及周边缝线的影响。绵羊模型。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Oct;100(6):611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Barbed sutures versus conventional tenorrhaphy in flexor tendon repair: An ex vivo biomechanical analysis.倒刺缝线与传统肌腱缝合术用于屈指肌腱修复的体外生物力学分析
Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):228-234. doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.00962. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Biomechanical Properties, Repair Times, and Value of Common Core Flexor Tendon Repairs.比较常见核心屈肌腱修复的生物力学特性、修复时间和价值。
Hand (N Y). 2018 May;13(3):313-318. doi: 10.1177/1558944717701238. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
2
Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs in the United States: Trends in Current Management.美国二区屈肌腱修复:当前治疗趋势
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Feb;42(2):e99-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
3
Biomechanical comparison of locked versus non-locked symphyseal plating of unstable pelvic ring injuries.不稳定骨盆环损伤中锁定与非锁定耻骨联合钢板固定的生物力学比较
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr;44(2):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0661-x. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
A knotless bidirectional-barbed tendon repair is inferior to conventional 4-strand repairs in cyclic loading.在循环加载情况下,无结双向倒刺肌腱修复术比传统的四股修复术效果差。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Oct;41(8):809-14. doi: 10.1177/1753193416631440. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
5
A Mechanical Evaluation of Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair Using a Knotless Barbed Suture Versus a Traditional Braided Suture.使用无结倒刺缝线与传统编织缝线对Ⅱ区屈肌腱修复进行的力学评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
The effect of suture caliber and number of core suture strands on zone II flexor tendon repair: a study in human cadavers.缝线直径及核心缝线股数对Ⅱ区屈指肌腱修复的影响:一项人体尸体研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Feb;39(2):262-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
7
Tensile strength of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material in a dynamic ex vivo model.在动态体外模型中使用带倒刺缝合材料修复屈肌腱的拉伸强度。
J Hand Microsurg. 2012 Jun;4(1):16-20. doi: 10.1007/s12593-012-0063-1. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Suture purchase length: a biomechanical study of flexor tendon repair in newborn lambs.缝线植入长度:新生羔羊屈肌腱修复的生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jan;38(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
9
The effect of core suture flexor tendon repair techniques on gliding resistance during static cycle motion and load to failure: a human cadaver study.核心缝线屈肌腱修复技术对静态循环运动中滑动阻力和失效负荷的影响:一项人体尸体研究。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 May;37(4):316-22. doi: 10.1177/1753193411422793. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
10
A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods.一种使用双向倒刺缝线的无结屈肌腱修复技术:三种方法的离体比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Oct;128(4):322e-327e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c1f.