Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Jun;5(2):129-33. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.2.129. Epub 2013 May 15.
In cervical anterior approach, transverse skin incision is preferred due to cosmetic reasons. Precise skin incision is required to reach the surgery segment while minimizing soft tissue injury. Skin incision site is frequently identified using C-arm fluoroscopy or the carotid tubercle. Accordingly, this study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of skin incision using the carotid tubercle as a marker.
This study was retrospectively conducted on 114 patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery by the same surgeon from April 2004 to June 2012. The rate of the appropriate insertion of K-wire, which was inserted into the disc after anterior approach, into the surgery segment was compared between 62 patients where skin incision site was identified using C-arm fluoroscopy before skin incision and 52 patients where skin incision site was identified using carotid tubercle palpitation before surgery.
The needle was shown to have been inserted into the planned site in 106 patients out of the total 114 patients. The appropriate insertion of the needle was shown in 59 patients of group I (95.2%) and in 47 patients of group II (90.4%). Although the success rate was higher in group I than group II, it was statistically insignificant. The success rate of one-segment surgery was shown to be 89.7% in group I and 82.6% in group II. Although the success rate was higher in group I than group II, it was statistically insignificant. The success rate of two-segment surgery was shown to be 100% in group I, and 96.4% in group II due to one case of the failure at C3-4 and C5-6. The success rate of three- and four-segment surgeries was shown to be 100% in both groups.
The identification of skin incision site via carotid tubercle palpation was useful for surgeries involving two or more segments. Furthermore, it could be useful for one-segment surgery if surgical site is identified using vertebral body or soft tissues such as longus collis rather than insertion into the disc.
在颈椎前路手术中,由于美容原因,通常选择横行皮肤切口。为了到达手术节段并尽量减少软组织损伤,需要精确的皮肤切口。皮肤切口的位置通常通过 C 臂透视或颈动脉结节来确定。因此,本研究旨在探讨以颈动脉结节作为标记进行皮肤切口的效果。
本研究回顾性分析了 2004 年 4 月至 2012 年 6 月期间由同一位外科医生进行的 114 例前路颈椎手术患者。比较了在皮肤切开前使用 C 臂透视确定皮肤切口位置的 62 例患者和在手术前使用颈动脉结节触诊确定皮肤切口位置的 52 例患者,比较了两种方法下,将 K 线插入前路手术后的椎间盘内,进入手术节段的成功率。
在 114 例患者中,106 例患者的针被显示插入到计划的部位。组 I(95.2%)中有 59 例患者和组 II(90.4%)中有 47 例患者的针插入适当。尽管组 I 的成功率高于组 II,但差异无统计学意义。组 I 的单节段手术成功率为 89.7%,组 II 的成功率为 82.6%。尽管组 I 的成功率高于组 II,但差异无统计学意义。组 I 的两节段手术成功率为 100%,组 II 由于 C3-4 和 C5-6 处的 1 例失败,成功率为 96.4%。两组三节段和四节段手术的成功率均为 100%。
通过颈动脉结节触诊确定皮肤切口位置对于涉及两个或更多节段的手术是有用的。此外,如果通过椎体或长颈肌等软组织而不是插入椎间盘来确定手术部位,对于单节段手术也可能有用。