Department of Counseling and Family Therapy, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121-4400, USA.
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2013 Jul;19(3):357-68. doi: 10.1037/a0031905. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
This study examines reliability and validity estimates for 3 widely used measures in body image research in a sample of African American college women (N = 278). Internal consistency estimates were adequate (α coefficients above .70) for all measures, and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was found. Confirmatory factor analyses failed to replicate the hypothesized factor structures of these measures. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that 4 factors found for the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire were similar to the hypothesized subscales, with fewer items. The factors found for the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales and the Body Dissatisfaction subscale of the Eating Disorders Inventory-3 were not similar to the subscales developed by the scale authors. Validity and reliability evidence is discussed for the new factors.
本研究在一个非裔美国女大学生样本中（N=278），对身体意象研究中 3 种广泛使用的测量工具的信度和效度估计进行了检验。所有测量工具的内部一致性估计值都足够高（α系数高于.70），并且发现了收敛和区别效度的证据。验证性因子分析未能复制这些测量工具假设的因子结构。探索性因子分析表明，社会文化对外观态度问卷中的 4 个因子与假设的分量表相似，但项目较少。多维身体自我关系问卷-外观量表和饮食失调问卷-3 的身体不满分量表的因子与量表作者开发的分量表不相似。新因子的效度和信度证据进行了讨论。
