Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Shonan Kamakura Hospital, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2013 Oct;62(4):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 31.
Octogenarians (age ≥ 80 years) with coronary artery disease constitute a high-risk group. However, octogenarian patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the drug-eluting stents (DES) era have not been widely reported. We aimed to identify clinical outcomes in octogenarian compared with non-octogenarian AMI patients.
We retrospectively analyzed 9877 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and who were enrolled in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). They were divided into 2 groups, octogenarians (n=1494) and non-octogenarians (n=8383), in order to compare the incidence of 1-year all-cause death and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), where MACE included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
The clinical status was significantly inferior in octogenarians compared to non-octogenarians: Killip class ≥ II (34.8% vs. 22.5%, p<0.001), multivessel disease (65.8% vs. 53.7%, p<0.001). Rates of 1-year all-cause death were significantly higher in octogenarians than in non-octogenarians (22.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). However, the rates of 1-year recurrent myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.68), TLR (2.4% vs. 3.1%, p=0.69), TVR (3.6% vs. 4.3%, p=0.96), and CABG (0.9% vs. 0.9%, p=0.76) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.
Octogenarian AMI patients have higher rates of mortality and MACE even in the DES era. According to KAMIR subgroup analysis, the TLR/TVR rates in octogenarians were comparable to those in non-octogenarian AMI patients.
80 岁及以上(年龄≥80 岁)的老年人患有冠状动脉疾病,属于高危人群。然而,在药物洗脱支架(DES)时代,老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的情况尚未得到广泛报道。本研究旨在比较 80 岁以上与非 80 岁以上 AMI 患者的临床结局。
我们回顾性分析了 9877 例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并植入药物洗脱支架(DES)的患者,这些患者被纳入韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究(KAMIR)。将患者分为 2 组:80 岁以上(n=1494)和非 80 岁以上(n=8383),以比较 1 年全因死亡率和 1 年主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率,其中 MACE 包括全因死亡、复发性心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建(TVR)、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。
与非 80 岁以上患者相比,80 岁以上患者的临床状况明显较差:Killip 分级≥Ⅱ级(34.8% vs. 22.5%,p<0.001),多血管病变(65.8% vs. 53.7%,p<0.001)。80 岁以上患者 1 年全因死亡率明显高于非 80 岁以上患者(22.3% vs. 6.5%,p<0.001)。然而,两组患者 1 年复发心肌梗死率(1.3% vs. 0.9%,p=0.68)、TLR 率(2.4% vs. 3.1%,p=0.69)、TVR 率(3.6% vs. 4.3%,p=0.96)和 CABG 率(0.9% vs. 0.9%,p=0.76)差异均无统计学意义。
即使在 DES 时代,80 岁以上 AMI 患者的死亡率和 MACE 发生率仍较高。根据 KAMIR 亚组分析,80 岁以上患者的 TLR/TVR 率与非 80 岁以上 AMI 患者相当。