Suppr超能文献

在药物洗脱支架时代,80 岁以上与非 80 岁以上急性心肌梗死患者的临床结局比较:韩国急性心肌梗死注册分析。

Comparison of clinical outcomes between octogenarians and non-octogenarians with acute myocardial infarction in the drug-eluting stent era: analysis of the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.

机构信息

Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Shonan Kamakura Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2013 Oct;62(4):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Octogenarians (age ≥ 80 years) with coronary artery disease constitute a high-risk group. However, octogenarian patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the drug-eluting stents (DES) era have not been widely reported. We aimed to identify clinical outcomes in octogenarian compared with non-octogenarian AMI patients.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

We retrospectively analyzed 9877 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and who were enrolled in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). They were divided into 2 groups, octogenarians (n=1494) and non-octogenarians (n=8383), in order to compare the incidence of 1-year all-cause death and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), where MACE included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

RESULTS

The clinical status was significantly inferior in octogenarians compared to non-octogenarians: Killip class ≥ II (34.8% vs. 22.5%, p<0.001), multivessel disease (65.8% vs. 53.7%, p<0.001). Rates of 1-year all-cause death were significantly higher in octogenarians than in non-octogenarians (22.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). However, the rates of 1-year recurrent myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.68), TLR (2.4% vs. 3.1%, p=0.69), TVR (3.6% vs. 4.3%, p=0.96), and CABG (0.9% vs. 0.9%, p=0.76) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarian AMI patients have higher rates of mortality and MACE even in the DES era. According to KAMIR subgroup analysis, the TLR/TVR rates in octogenarians were comparable to those in non-octogenarian AMI patients.

摘要

背景与目的

80 岁及以上(年龄≥80 岁)的老年人患有冠状动脉疾病,属于高危人群。然而,在药物洗脱支架(DES)时代,老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的情况尚未得到广泛报道。本研究旨在比较 80 岁以上与非 80 岁以上 AMI 患者的临床结局。

方法和受试者

我们回顾性分析了 9877 例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并植入药物洗脱支架(DES)的患者,这些患者被纳入韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究(KAMIR)。将患者分为 2 组:80 岁以上(n=1494)和非 80 岁以上(n=8383),以比较 1 年全因死亡率和 1 年主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率,其中 MACE 包括全因死亡、复发性心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建(TVR)、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。

结果

与非 80 岁以上患者相比,80 岁以上患者的临床状况明显较差:Killip 分级≥Ⅱ级(34.8% vs. 22.5%,p<0.001),多血管病变(65.8% vs. 53.7%,p<0.001)。80 岁以上患者 1 年全因死亡率明显高于非 80 岁以上患者(22.3% vs. 6.5%,p<0.001)。然而,两组患者 1 年复发心肌梗死率(1.3% vs. 0.9%,p=0.68)、TLR 率(2.4% vs. 3.1%,p=0.69)、TVR 率(3.6% vs. 4.3%,p=0.96)和 CABG 率(0.9% vs. 0.9%,p=0.76)差异均无统计学意义。

结论

即使在 DES 时代,80 岁以上 AMI 患者的死亡率和 MACE 发生率仍较高。根据 KAMIR 亚组分析,80 岁以上患者的 TLR/TVR 率与非 80 岁以上 AMI 患者相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验