Moos R H
Social Ecology Laboratory, Stanford University, Palo Alto CA.
Fam Process. 1990 Jun;29(2):199-208; discussion 209-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00199.x.
This article focuses on the reliability and validity of the Family Environment Scale (FES). The FES subscales generally show adequate internal consistency reliability and stability over time when applied in samples that are diverse; the items also have good content and face validity. An extensive body of research supports the construct, concurrent, and predictive validity of the FES. More generally, reliability and validity are a joint function of scale items and response formats and of the characteristics and diversity of specific samples. To contribute to further advances in family assessment, researchers need to use both conceptual and psychometric criteria rather than rely too heavily on the pursuit of internal consistency reliability and factor analytic approaches to scale construction and validation.
本文重点关注家庭环境量表(FES)的信度和效度。当应用于多样化的样本时,FES分量表通常显示出足够的内部一致性信度和随时间的稳定性;这些项目也具有良好的内容效度和表面效度。大量研究支持FES的结构效度、同时效度和预测效度。更一般地说,信度和效度是量表项目、反应格式以及特定样本的特征和多样性的共同作用。为了推动家庭评估的进一步发展,研究人员需要同时使用概念性和心理测量学标准,而不是过于依赖追求内部一致性信度以及采用因素分析方法来进行量表的编制和验证。