• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌手术后的抢救失败与三个结构性医院因素的关系。

Failure-to-rescue after colorectal cancer surgery and the association with three structural hospital factors.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, K-6, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3370-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z
PMID:23732859
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the association between structural hospital characteristics and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colorectal cancer surgery. A growing body of evidence suggests a large hospital variation concerning mortality rates in patients with a severe complication (FTR) in colorectal cancer surgery. Which structural hospital factors are associated with better FTR rates remains largely unclear.

METHODS

All patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 through 2011 in 92 Dutch hospitals were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, including casemix, hospital volume, teaching status, and different levels of intensive care unit (ICU) facilities, were used to analyse risk-adjusted FTR rates.

RESULTS

A total of 25,591 patients from 92 hospitals were included. The FTR rate ranged between 0 and 39 %. In univariate analysis, high hospital volume (>200 vs. ≤200 patients/year), teaching status (academic vs. teaching vs. nonteaching hospitals) and high level of ICU facilities (highest level 3 vs. lowest level 1) were associated with lower FTR rates. Only the higher levels of ICU facilities (2 or 3 compared with level 1) were independently associated with lower failure-to-rescue rates (odds ratio 0.72; 95 % confidence interval 0.65-0.88) in multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

Hospital type and annual hospital volume were not independently associated with FTR rates in colorectal cancer surgery. Instead, the lowest level of ICU facilities was independently associated with higher rates. This suggests that a more advanced ICU may be an important factor that contributes to better failure-to-rescue rates, although individual hospitals perform well with lower ICU levels.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估结直肠癌手术后结构性医院特征与救治失败(FTR)之间的关系。越来越多的证据表明,在结直肠癌手术后严重并发症(FTR)患者的死亡率方面,医院之间存在较大差异。哪些结构性医院因素与更好的 FTR 率相关仍很大程度上不清楚。

方法

分析了 2009 年至 2011 年期间 92 家荷兰医院接受结直肠癌手术的所有患者。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型,包括病例组合、医院容量、教学地位以及不同级别的重症监护病房(ICU)设施,分析风险调整后的 FTR 率。

结果

共纳入 92 家医院的 25591 例患者。FTR 率在 0 至 39%之间。单因素分析显示,高医院容量(>200 例/年与≤200 例/年)、教学地位(学术与教学与非教学医院)和 ICU 设施水平高(最高水平 3 与最低水平 1)与较低的 FTR 率相关。仅 ICU 设施的较高水平(2 级或 3 级与 1 级相比)与多变量分析中较低的救治失败率独立相关(比值比 0.72;95%置信区间 0.65-0.88)。

讨论

医院类型和医院年容量与结直肠癌手术后的 FTR 率无关。相反,ICU 设施的最低水平与更高的 FTR 率独立相关。这表明更先进的 ICU 可能是导致救治失败率降低的一个重要因素,尽管一些医院在较低的 ICU 水平下表现良好。

相似文献

1
Failure-to-rescue after colorectal cancer surgery and the association with three structural hospital factors.结直肠癌手术后的抢救失败与三个结构性医院因素的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3370-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
2
Hospital variation in failure to rescue after colorectal cancer surgery: results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.荷兰外科结直肠审计:结直肠癌手术后未能抢救的医院差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;20(7):2117-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2896-7. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
3
Value of failure to rescue as a marker of the standard of care following reoperation for complications after colorectal resection.再次手术后因并发症而进行抢救失败的价值作为结直肠切除术后并发症治疗标准的标志物。
Br J Surg. 2011 Dec;98(12):1775-83. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7648. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
4
The relative effect of hospital and surgeon volume on failure to rescue among patients undergoing liver resection for cancer.医院规模和外科医生手术量对肝癌肝切除患者抢救失败的相对影响。
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1004-12. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Failure to rescue in safety-net hospitals: availability of hospital resources and differences in performance.安全网医院的救援失败:医院资源的可用性和绩效差异。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):229-35. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3566.
6
Hospital Teaching Status and Patients' Outcomes After Colon Cancer Surgery.结肠癌手术后的医院教学状况与患者预后
World J Surg. 2018 Oct;42(10):3372-3380. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4580-3.
7
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
8
Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement.择期结直肠癌手术的安全性:非手术并发症和结肠切除术是质量改进的目标。
J Surg Oncol. 2014 May;109(6):567-73. doi: 10.1002/jso.23532. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality for ovarian cancer.未能抢救是导致卵巢癌医院死亡率差异的一个原因。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 10;30(32):3976-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2906. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
10
No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands.荷兰南部结直肠手术后,低容量医院与高容量医院的结局无差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;39(11):1199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Truly Inevitable-Our Perspective on the Complications After Surgery for Rectal Cancer.真正不可避免——我们对直肠癌手术后并发症的看法。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):667-675. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02125-3. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center.衰老如何影响结直肠腹腔镜手术后的抢救失败。对一个高容量单一中心的1000例患者进行分析。
Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02173-6.
3
Patterns of Referral for Common Cancer Surgery in the United States.
美国常见癌症手术的转诊模式。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3429-3440. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17026-0. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Enhanced Recovery Independently Lowers Failure to Rescue After Colorectal Surgery.强化康复可独立降低结直肠手术后的抢救失败率。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 May 1;68(5):616-626. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003655. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
5
Impact of hospital volume on failure to rescue for complications requiring reoperation after elective colorectal surgery: multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.择期结直肠手术后因需要再次手术的并发症而导致抢救失败的医院容量影响:多中心倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BJS Open. 2024 Mar 1;8(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae025.
6
Perioperative predictive factors of failure to rescue following highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a single-institution retrospective study.高难度肝胆胰手术后抢救失败的围手术期预测因素:单中心回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov 24;21(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03257-6.
7
Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery.与急诊左半结肠手术相关的手术结果和预后因素。
Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;43(2):97-104. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.97. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
8
Who should operate patients presenting with emergent colon cancer? A comparison of short- and long-term outcome depending on surgical sub-specialization.哪些医生应该为急症结肠癌患者进行手术?根据手术亚专业的不同,比较短期和长期的结果。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jan 9;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00474-y.
9
Data analytics and artificial intelligence in predicting length of stay, readmission, and mortality: a population-based study of surgical management of colorectal cancer.数据分析与人工智能在预测住院时间、再入院率和死亡率方面的应用:一项基于人群的结直肠癌手术治疗研究
Discov Oncol. 2022 Feb 28;13(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00472-7.
10
Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery.中心级手术量并不预测肿瘤结直肠手术后严重并发症的抢救失败。
World J Surg. 2021 Dec;45(12):3695-3706. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w. Epub 2021 Aug 27.