Fitzpatrick G F, Meguid M M, O'Connell R C, O'Connor N E, Ball M R, Brennan M F
Surgery. 1975 Jul;78(1):105-13.
To test whether oral carbohydrate would provide greater conservation of body protein than would intravenous carbohydrate, healthy normal human subjects were infused with high doses of glucose either continuously intravenously or by nasogastric tube in both continuous and intermittent regimes. Metabolic responses to high calorie, nitrogen-free infusions in normal man were documented in the blood hormone and substrate changes, and protein sparing was assessed by urinary nitrogen excretion. Continuous glucose produced a lower urinary "nitrogen floor" than did the intermittent regime, and intravenous glucose was more effective than was oral glucose. The insulin responses to continuous nasogastric and continuous intravenous glucose were similar, and nitrogen excretion did not differ between those two groups. The increased insulin levels seen with intermittent glucose were not accompanied by greater protein sparing.
为了测试口服碳水化合物是否比静脉注射碳水化合物能更好地保存机体蛋白质,健康正常人体受试者被给予高剂量葡萄糖,分别通过静脉持续输注、鼻胃管持续输注和间歇输注。记录了正常人体对高热量、无氮输注的代谢反应,包括血液中激素和底物的变化,并通过尿氮排泄评估蛋白质节约情况。持续输注葡萄糖产生的尿“氮基线”低于间歇输注,静脉注射葡萄糖比口服葡萄糖更有效。持续鼻胃管输注葡萄糖和持续静脉输注葡萄糖时的胰岛素反应相似,两组之间的氮排泄没有差异。间歇输注葡萄糖时胰岛素水平升高,但并未伴随更大程度的蛋白质节约。