Fischer-Brandies H, Lindner K
Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universität München.
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1990 Jun;51(3):149-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02164566.
16 film-screen cassette combinations (FSCC) were compared with regard to their detail sharpness and the radiation dose required. After standard adjustment to a uniform average optical density, the contrast and detail were analysed using a self-constructed microdensitometer. The following results were found; on average there is a 14.5% dose reduction using carbon fiber cassettes compared with aluminium cassettes. FSCC with especially low exposure time are: Cronex 2, fast detail, Du Pont (0.4 sec); Cronex 2, NPU, carbon fiber cassettes (0.5 sec); Curix RP1, NPU, carbon fiber cassettes (0.64 sec). The loss of quality associated with this and measured with the microdensitometer is insignificant for clinical orthodontic purposes. This study concludes that differences in contrast and detail do not justify the use of cassette combinations which require a high dose of radiation.
对16种胶片-屏片暗盒组合(FSCC)的细节清晰度和所需辐射剂量进行了比较。在将其标准调整到均匀的平均光学密度后,使用自行构建的微密度计分析对比度和细节。得到以下结果:与铝制暗盒相比,使用碳纤维暗盒平均可减少14.5%的剂量。曝光时间特别短的FSCC有:杜邦公司的Cronex 2快速细节型(0.4秒);NPU的Cronex 2碳纤维暗盒(0.5秒);NPU的Curix RP1碳纤维暗盒(0.64秒)。用微密度计测量的与此相关的质量损失对于临床正畸目的而言微不足道。本研究得出结论,对比度和细节上的差异并不能证明使用需要高辐射剂量的暗盒组合是合理的。