• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状识别和诊断标签对公众信念、情绪反应和智力障碍相关污名的影响[更正]。

The effects of symptom recognition and diagnostic labels on public beliefs, emotional reactions, and stigma [corrected] associated with intellectual disability.

出版信息

Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013 May;118(3):211-23. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-118.3.211.

DOI:10.1352/1944-7558-118.3.211
PMID:23734616
Abstract

Labels are firmly rejected by the disability rights movement, yet the complex effects of labeling on lay beliefs are poorly understood. This study examined the effects of labeling on the general public's reactions to people with intellectual disabilities. A sample of 1,233 adult members of the UK general population were randomly presented with either a diagnostically labeled or unlabeled case vignette, and their emotional reactions, causal beliefs, and social distance were assessed. Providing a label reduced social distance, increased biomedical attributions, and had a small positive direct effect on emotional reactions. Making a diagnosis of mild intellectual disability known may prevent misattribution to more stigmatizing causes and thus reduce social distance. Some undesirable effects were observed though on causal beliefs and associated emotional reactions.

摘要

标签被残疾权利运动坚决拒绝,但标签对大众观念的复杂影响还未被很好地理解。本研究调查了标签对大众对智障人士反应的影响。英国 1233 名成年普通民众被随机展示了有或无诊断标签的案例简述,他们的情绪反应、因果观念和社会距离被评估。提供标签减少了社会距离,增加了生物医学归因,对情绪反应有微小的直接积极影响。公开轻度智障的诊断可能会防止归因于更具污名化的原因,从而减少社会距离。但是,在因果观念和相关情绪反应上还是观察到了一些不良影响。

相似文献

1
The effects of symptom recognition and diagnostic labels on public beliefs, emotional reactions, and stigma [corrected] associated with intellectual disability.症状识别和诊断标签对公众信念、情绪反应和智力障碍相关污名的影响[更正]。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013 May;118(3):211-23. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-118.3.211.
2
The relationship between awareness of intellectual disability, causal and intervention beliefs and social distance in Kuwait and the UK.科威特和英国的智障意识、因果和干预信念与社会距离之间的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Nov;34(11):3896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.030. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
3
Public beliefs about and attitudes towards bipolar disorder: testing theory based models of stigma.公众对双相情感障碍的看法和态度:基于理论的污名模型测试
J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr 1;175:116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.047. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
4
Awareness of schizophrenia and intellectual disability and stigma across ethnic groups in the UK.英国不同族裔群体对精神分裂症和智力残疾的认知及污名化。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Jul 30;208(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.059. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
5
The association between contact and intellectual disability literacy, causal attributions and stigma.接触与智力残疾认知、因果归因及污名之间的关联。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Mar;60(3):218-27. doi: 10.1111/jir.12241. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
6
Development and validation of the Intellectual Disability Literacy Scale for assessment of knowledge, beliefs and attitudes to intellectual disability.发展和验证智力残疾素养量表,以评估对智力残疾的知识、信念和态度。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1530-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.044. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
7
Causal beliefs about intellectual disability and schizophrenia and their relationship with awareness of the condition and social distance.关于智力障碍和精神分裂症的因果信念及其与对病情的认识和社会距离的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Sep 30;243:100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
8
Public stigma and the perception of rights: differences between intellectual and physical disabilities.公众污名与权利认知:智力残疾与身体残疾之间的差异
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Mar;38:262-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.030. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
9
Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: a systematic review.公众对智力残疾的认知、态度和信念:系统评价。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2164-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
10
Tackling stigma associated with intellectual disability among the general public: a study of two indirect contact interventions.消除公众对智力残疾的污名化:两项间接接触干预研究。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jul;34(7):2200-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs: Progress Towards More Family-Centered Systems of Care.有特殊医疗需求的儿童和青少年:迈向更以家庭为中心的医疗体系的进展。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Nov 1. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-04010-5.
2
Asymmetrical genetic attributions for the presence and absence of health problems.健康问题存在与否的非对称遗传归因。
Psychol Health. 2024 Jul;39(7):839-857. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2119236. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Intellectual disability literacy and its connection to stigma: A multinational comparison study in three European countries.
智力残疾素养及其与污名的关系:三个欧洲国家的跨国比较研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0239936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239936. eCollection 2020.
4
Implicit Attitudes towards People with Intellectual Disabilities: Their Relationship with Explicit Attitudes, Social Distance, Emotions and Contact.对智障人士的隐性态度:它们与显性态度、社会距离、情感及接触的关系。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137902. eCollection 2015.