Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia; Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia; State Wide Emergency Department Network, Brisbane, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2013 Dec;43(12):1293-303. doi: 10.1111/imj.12202.
Emergency department (ED) crowding caused by access block is an increasing public health issue and has been associated with impaired healthcare delivery, negative patient outcomes and increased staff workload.
To investigate the impact of opening a new ED on patient and healthcare service outcomes.
A 24-month time series analysis was employed using deterministically linked data from the ambulance service and three ED and hospital admission databases in Queensland, Australia.
Total volume of ED presentations increased 18%, while local population growth increased by 3%. Healthcare service and patient outcomes at the two pre-existing hospitals did not improve. These outcomes included ambulance offload time: (Hospital A PRE: 10 min, POST: 10 min, P < 0.001; Hospital B PRE: 10 min, POST: 15 min, P < 0.001); ED length of stay: (Hospital A PRE: 242 min, POST: 246 min, P < 0.001; Hospital B PRE: 182 min, POST: 210 min, P < 0.001); and access block: (Hospital A PRE: 41%, POST: 46%, P < 0.001; Hospital B PRE: 23%, POST: 40%, P < 0.001). Time series modelling indicated that the effect was worst at the hospital furthest away from the new ED.
An additional ED within the region saw an increase in the total volume of presentations at a rate far greater than local population growth, suggesting it either provided an unmet need or a shifting of activity from one sector to another. Future studies should examine patient decision making regarding reasons for presenting to a new or pre-existing ED. There is an inherent need to take a 'whole of health service area' approach to solve crowding issues.
由于通道阻塞导致的急诊(ED)拥堵是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,它与医疗服务提供受损、患者预后不良和工作人员工作量增加有关。
调查开设新 ED 对患者和医疗服务结果的影响。
采用澳大利亚昆士兰州救护车服务和三个 ED 及住院数据库的确定性链接数据,进行了为期 24 个月的时间序列分析。
ED 就诊总量增加了 18%,而当地人口增长了 3%。两所现有医院的医疗服务和患者结果没有改善。这些结果包括救护车下车时间:(医院 A 之前:10 分钟,之后:10 分钟,P < 0.001;医院 B 之前:10 分钟,之后:15 分钟,P < 0.001);ED 住院时间:(医院 A 之前:242 分钟,之后:246 分钟,P < 0.001;医院 B 之前:182 分钟,之后:210 分钟,P < 0.001);和通道阻塞:(医院 A 之前:41%,之后:46%,P < 0.001;医院 B 之前:23%,之后:40%,P < 0.001)。时间序列模型表明,这种影响在离新 ED 最远的医院最为严重。
该地区的另一家 ED 就诊总量增加,增加速度远远超过当地人口增长,这表明它要么提供了未满足的需求,要么是活动从一个部门转移到另一个部门。未来的研究应研究患者对就诊于新 ED 或现有 ED 的决策原因。从根本上需要采取“整个卫生服务区域”的方法来解决拥堵问题。