Department of Digestive and Metabolic Surgery, North University Hospital Centre of Amiens, Place Victor Pauchet, 80054 Amiens Cedex, France; University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Ann Anat. 2013 Oct;195(5):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 May 10.
The Société Française de Chirurgie Digestive and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommend a ligation at the origin of the primary feeding vessel for sigmoid cancer to ensure optimal lymphadenectomy. We evaluated the correlation between the level of ligation defined by the surgeon and the real level of ligation visualized on postoperative CT scan.
From December 2004 to August 2010, in a series of 146 patients undergoing colectomy for sigmoid cancer, 51 (19 women) CT measurements (visualization of the left colonic artery (LCA), length of the arterial stump) were performed by a radiologist blinded to operative data.
This series comprised 63% of men with a mean age of 69 years. A correlation was demonstrated between the level of ligation assessed by the surgeon and the real level of ligation demonstrated on postoperative CT scan in 41% of cases. No risk factors for absence of correlation were identified (laparoscopy, gender, BMI, emergency, and ASA score). In the "no correlation" group, the site of ligation was overestimated in 70% of cases. No significant difference was observed between the "correlation" and "no correlation" groups for lymphadenectomy (21.6 and 18 lymph nodes, p=0.5593) or 5-year overall survival (71.4 and 93.1 months, p=0.57).
In conclusion, the surgical and radiological correlations are low as the intraoperative estimation of the level of IMA ligation was correlated with CT findings in less than 50% of cases. No risk factors for non-correlation were identified, and there was no impact on lymphadenectomy. Overestimation of the level of ligation was the most frequent situation but did not appear to have any impact on tumor staging or on patient management in this group of patients.
法国消化外科学会和美国结直肠外科学会建议对乙状结肠癌进行主要供血血管的结扎以确保最佳的淋巴结清扫。我们评估了外科医生定义的结扎水平与术后 CT 扫描上实际结扎水平之间的相关性。
在 2004 年 12 月至 2010 年 8 月期间,对 146 例接受乙状结肠癌切除术的患者进行了一项研究,其中 51 例(19 例为女性)由一名放射科医生进行 CT 测量(左结肠动脉可视化、动脉残端长度),该放射科医生对手术数据不知情。
该系列包括 63%的男性,平均年龄为 69 岁。在 41%的病例中,外科医生评估的结扎水平与术后 CT 扫描上显示的实际结扎水平之间存在相关性。未发现无相关性的风险因素(腹腔镜、性别、BMI、紧急情况和 ASA 评分)。在“无相关性”组中,结扎部位有 70%的高估。在“相关性”和“无相关性”两组之间,淋巴结清扫(21.6 和 18 个淋巴结,p=0.5593)或 5 年总生存率(71.4 和 93.1 个月,p=0.57)无显著差异。
总之,手术和影像学之间的相关性较低,因为术中IMA 结扎水平的估计与不到 50%的病例的 CT 发现相关。未发现无相关性的风险因素,并且对淋巴结清扫没有影响。结扎水平的高估是最常见的情况,但在这组患者中似乎对肿瘤分期或患者管理没有影响。