Wikner Franciska, Matthiessen Peter, Sörelius Karl, Legrell Petter, Rutegård Martin
Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 13;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02222-5.
The reliability of the registered ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry has been questioned. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate this parameter in the registry by comparing the registered ligation levels with a postoperative computed tomography angiography (CT-angiography) in patients operated for rectal cancer.
Patients operated for rectal cancer at two Swedish university hospitals were prospectively included between December 2016 and December 2019. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, an additional CT-angiography was performed and independently examined by two radiologists. The radiological assessment of the ligation level was compared to registry data, using different measures of agreement.
A total of 94 patients were included, 55 (59%) were men and 39 (41%) women. All patients underwent abdominal resection: conventional or robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, n=56 (60%), or open resection, n=38 (40%). The ligation level as assessed on CT-angiography was high in 29 (31%) patients and low in 65 (69%). The registered level of ligation of the IMA and the radiological assessment of the CT-angiographies were consistent in 77/94 cases, demonstrating an 82% agreement and a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 72%, respectively. The estimated Kappa value was 0.58, reaching 0.64 after prevalence bias adjustment.
This study showed that CT-angiography can be used to evaluate the reliability of the registered ligation level in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The demonstrated agreement between the registry and postoperative CT-angiography was moderate to good. This discrepancy impacts registry-based research using IMA ligation data and may ultimately influence surgical practice.
Clinical Trials identifier NCT03875612.
瑞典结直肠癌登记处记录的肠系膜下动脉(IMA)结扎水平的可靠性受到质疑。本研究的主要目的是通过比较直肠癌手术患者登记的结扎水平与术后计算机断层扫描血管造影(CT血管造影)来评估登记处的这一参数。
前瞻性纳入2016年12月至2019年12月在两家瑞典大学医院接受直肠癌手术的患者。在术后1年随访时,进行额外的CT血管造影,并由两名放射科医生独立检查。使用不同的一致性测量方法,将结扎水平的放射学评估与登记数据进行比较。
共纳入94例患者,其中55例(59%)为男性,39例(41%)为女性。所有患者均接受腹部切除术:传统或机器人辅助腹腔镜手术,n = 56(60%),或开放切除术,n = 38(40%)。CT血管造影评估的结扎水平在29例(31%)患者中为高位,在65例(69%)患者中为低位。IMA登记的结扎水平与CT血管造影的放射学评估在77/94例中一致,一致性为82%,敏感性和特异性分别为86%和72%。估计的Kappa值为0.58,经患病率偏倚调整后达到0.64。
本研究表明,CT血管造影可用于评估瑞典结直肠癌登记处记录的结扎水平的可靠性。登记处与术后CT血管造影之间显示出中度至良好的一致性。这种差异影响了使用IMA结扎数据的基于登记处的研究,并可能最终影响手术实践。
临床试验标识符NCT03875612。