Wright L, Schmidt-Walker K
Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman 73019.
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1990;20(1):85-96. doi: 10.2190/YDK9-J9NV-5RA2-RXDV.
The authors note an increasing interest in certain subcomponents of the Type A behavior pattern (TABP) such as time urgency, perpetual activation, and anger in versus anger out. Based on that observation they pilot tested twenty-four newly created interview items designed to augment those of the commonly employed Structured Interview (SI). Nineteen of the twenty-four items were then selected for use in more precise assessment of the four TABP subcomponents mentioned above. These new items, in combination with those of the existing SI, were labeled the Augmented Structured Interview (ASI). Obtained data on the ASI items support the need for assessing Type A subcomponents (instead of relying solely on a global measure of the TABP). The data also suggest that TABP subcomponents are best assessed by means of interview items rather than self report measures. The ASI is recommended for both clinical and research purposes as a supplement to the SI, which to date has proven to be the best means for measuring global Type A tendencies.
作者们注意到,人们对A型行为模式(TABP)的某些子成分越来越感兴趣,比如时间紧迫感、持续激活状态以及内向型愤怒与外向型愤怒。基于这一观察结果,他们对24个新创建的访谈项目进行了预测试,这些项目旨在补充常用结构化访谈(SI)中的项目。随后,从这24个项目中挑选出19个,用于更精确地评估上述四个TABP子成分。这些新项目与现有SI中的项目相结合,被标记为增强型结构化访谈(ASI)。从ASI项目中获得的数据支持了评估A型子成分的必要性(而不是仅仅依赖于对TABP的整体测量)。数据还表明,通过访谈项目而不是自我报告测量方法来评估TABP子成分是最好的。推荐将ASI用于临床和研究目的,作为SI的补充,迄今为止,SI已被证明是测量整体A型倾向的最佳方法。