Bennett P, Gallacher J, Johnston D
Health Promotion Authority for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1990 May;29(2):155-65. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1990.tb00865.x.
To investigate the feasibility of developing a measure of state Type A behaviour, a random sample of 95 men aged 40-64 years attended a clinic at which Type A behaviour was assessed using the Structured Interview (Rosenman, 1978). Upon completion of the Structured Interview, subjects were administered a 65-item adjective checklist to describe their experience of the interview. Discriminant function analysis of adjective ratings on Structured Interview classification identified 15 adjectives which allowed 83 per cent correct classification. The limitation of these data includes the small sample size and the uniqueness of the Structured Interview situation. Nevertheless, these data provide encouragement that a robust and versatile measure of state Type A could be developed. Comparisons between various measures of trait Type A behaviour are also reported.
为了研究开发一种状态A型行为测量方法的可行性,从40至64岁的男性中随机抽取95人参加一个诊所的测试,在该诊所使用结构化访谈法(罗森曼,1978年)对A型行为进行评估。在完成结构化访谈后,让受试者填写一份包含65个形容词的清单,以描述他们对访谈的体验。对结构化访谈分类中形容词评级进行判别函数分析,确定了15个形容词,其正确分类率达83%。这些数据的局限性包括样本量小以及结构化访谈情境的独特性。尽管如此,这些数据为开发一种可靠且通用的状态A型行为测量方法提供了鼓舞。同时还报告了各种特质A型行为测量方法之间的比较情况。