Institut de l'Elevage, F-31321 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
J Anim Sci. 2013 Aug;91(8):3644-57. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6205. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
In conventional small ruminant breeding programs, only pedigree and phenotype records are used to make selection decisions but prospects of including genomic information are now under consideration. The objective of this study was to assess the potential benefits of genomic selection on the genetic gain in French sheep and goat breeding designs of today. Traditional and genomic scenarios were modeled with deterministic methods for 3 breeding programs. The models included decisional variables related to male selection candidates, progeny testing capacity, and economic weights that were optimized to maximize annual genetic gain (AGG) of i) a meat sheep breeding program that improved a meat trait of heritability (h(2)) = 0.30 and a maternal trait of h(2) = 0.09 and ii) dairy sheep and goat breeding programs that improved a milk trait of h(2) = 0.30. Values of ±0.20 of genetic correlation between meat and maternal traits were considered to study their effects on AGG. The Bulmer effect was accounted for and the results presented here are the averages of AGG after 10 generations of selection. Results showed that current traditional breeding programs provide an AGG of 0.095 genetic standard deviation (σa) for meat and 0.061 σa for maternal trait in meat breed and 0.147 σa and 0.120 σa in sheep and goat dairy breeds, respectively. By optimizing decisional variables, the AGG with traditional selection methods increased to 0.139 σa for meat and 0.096 σa for maternal traits in meat breeding programs and to 0.174 σa and 0.183 σa in dairy sheep and goat breeding programs, respectively. With a medium-sized reference population (nref) of 2,000 individuals, the best genomic scenarios gave an AGG that was 17.9% greater than with traditional selection methods with optimized values of decisional variables for combined meat and maternal traits in meat sheep, 51.7% in dairy sheep, and 26.2% in dairy goats. The superiority of genomic schemes increased with the size of the reference population and genomic selection gave the best results when nref > 1,000 individuals for dairy breeds and nref > 2,000 individuals for meat breed. Genetic correlation between meat and maternal traits had a large impact on the genetic gain of both traits. Changes in AGG due to correlation were greatest for low heritable maternal traits. As a general rule, AGG was increased both by optimizing selection designs and including genomic information.
在传统的小反刍动物育种计划中,仅使用谱系和表型记录来做出选择决策,但现在正在考虑包括基因组信息的前景。本研究的目的是评估基因组选择对法国绵羊和山羊育种设计中遗传增益的潜在益处。使用确定性方法对 3 个育种计划进行了传统和基因组方案的建模。模型包括与雄性选择候选者、后代测试能力和经济权重相关的决策变量,这些变量经过优化以最大程度地提高(i)一个提高遗传力(h2)为 0.30 的肉用绵羊育种计划和(ii)一个提高遗传力(h2)为 0.30 的奶用绵羊和山羊育种计划的年度遗传增益(AGG)。考虑了肉用和母性性状之间遗传相关±0.20 的值,以研究其对 AGG 的影响。考虑了布尔默效应,这里呈现的结果是经过 10 代选择后的 AGG 的平均值。结果表明,目前的传统育种计划为肉用品种的肉用和母性性状提供了 0.095 个遗传标准差(σa)的 AGG,绵羊和山羊奶用品种分别为 0.147 σa和 0.120 σa。通过优化决策变量,传统选择方法的 AGG 增加到肉用品种的 0.139 σa和母性性状的 0.096 σa,以及绵羊和山羊奶用品种的 0.174 σa和 0.183 σa。对于中等大小的参考群体(nref)为 2000 个个体,最佳基因组方案的 AGG 比具有优化决策变量值的传统选择方法高 17.9%,对于肉用绵羊的综合肉用和母性性状,51.7%在绵羊奶用品种中,以及 26.2%在山羊奶用品种中。基因组方案的优势随着参考群体的大小而增加,当 nref > 1000 个个体时,基因组选择在奶用品种中效果最佳,而当 nref > 2000 个个体时,在肉用品种中效果最佳。肉用和母性性状之间的遗传相关性对两个性状的遗传增益有很大影响。由于相关性而导致的 AGG 变化在低遗传力母性性状中最大。一般来说,通过优化选择设计和包括基因组信息,AG