Center for Translational Psychiatry, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.
PLoS One. 2013 May 30;8(5):e63734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063734. Print 2013.
The diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder has long maintained an uncertain status in psychiatric nosology. Studies comparing clinical and biological features of patients with schizoaffective disorder to patients with related disorders [e.g., schizophrenia and bipolar disorder] can provide an evidence base for judging the validity of the diagnostic category. However, because most prior studies of schizoaffective disorder have only evaluated differences between groups at a static timepoint, it is unclear how these disorders may be related when the entire illness course is taken into consideration.
We ascertained a large cohort [N = 993] of psychiatric patients with a range of psychotic diagnoses including schizophrenia with no history of major affective episodes [SZ-; N = 371], schizophrenia with a superimposed mood syndrome [SZ+; N = 224], schizoaffective disorder [SAD; N = 129] and bipolar I disorder with psychotic features [BPD+; N = 269]. Using cross-sectional data we designed key clinical and neurocognitive dependent measures that allowed us to test longitudinal hypotheses about the differences between these diagnostic entities.
Large differences between diagnostic groups on several demographic and clinical variables were observed. Most notably, groups differed on a putative measure of cognitive decline. Specifically, the SAD group demonstrated significantly greater post-onset cognitive decline compared to the BP+ group, with the SZ- and SZ+ group both exhibiting levels of decline intermediate to BPD+ and SAD.
These results suggest that schizoaffective disorder may possess distinct features. Contrary to earlier formulations, schizoaffective disorder may be a more severe form of illness.
精神分裂症谱系及相关障碍的诊断在精神医学分类中一直存在不确定性。将精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的临床和生物学特征与相关障碍患者(如精神分裂症和双相障碍)进行比较的研究,可以为判断该诊断类别有效性提供依据。然而,由于大多数精神分裂症谱系障碍的研究仅在静态时间点评估了组间差异,因此尚不清楚在考虑整个疾病过程时,这些障碍之间可能存在怎样的关联。
我们确定了一个包括多种精神病诊断的大型队列[共 993 例患者,包括无重大情感发作史的精神分裂症(SZ-;N=371)、伴有心境综合征的精神分裂症(SZ+;N=224)、精神分裂症谱系障碍(SAD;N=129)和伴有精神病特征的双相 I 障碍(BPD+;N=269]。我们使用横断面数据设计了关键的临床和神经认知依赖指标,以测试这些诊断实体之间差异的纵向假设。
在几个人口统计学和临床变量上,各诊断组之间存在较大差异。最值得注意的是,各诊断组之间在一种推测的认知衰退测量指标上存在差异。具体而言,SAD 组在发病后认知衰退方面显著大于 BPD+组,而 SZ-和 SZ+组的衰退水平介于 BPD+和 SAD 之间。
这些结果表明精神分裂症谱系障碍可能具有独特的特征。与早期的观点相反,精神分裂症谱系障碍可能是一种更严重的疾病形式。