GENERA, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy.
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2298-307. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det245. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
Does comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of cells sampled from the blastocyst trophectoderm (TE) accurately predict the chromosome complement of the inner cell mass (ICM)?
Comprehensive chromosome screening of a TE sample is unlikely to be confounded by mosaicism and has the potential for high diagnostic accuracy.
The effectiveness of chromosome aneuploidy screening is limited by the technologies available and chromosome mosaicism in the embryo. Combined with improving methods for cryopreservation and blastocyst culture, TE biopsy and CCS is considered to be a promising approach to select diploid embryos for transfer.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study was performed between January 2011 and August 2011. In the first part, a new ICM isolation method was developed and tested on 20 good morphology blastocysts. In the main phase of the study, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to reanalyse the ICMs and TEs separated from 70 embryos obtained from 26 patients undergoing blastocyst stage array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) PGS cycles.
MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The isolated ICM and TE fractions were characterized by immunostaining for KRT18. Then, non-transferrable cryopreserved embryos were selected for the FISH reanalysis based on previous genetic diagnosis obtained by TE aCGH analysis. Blastocysts either diploid for chromosome copy number (20) or diagnosed as single- (40) or double aneuploid (10) were included after preparing the embryo into one ICM and three equal-sized TE sections. Accuracy of the aCGH was measured based on FISH reanalysis. Chromosomal segregations resulting in diploid/aneuploid mosaicism were classified as 'low-', 'medium-' and 'high-' grade and categorized with respect to their distribution (1TE, 2TE, 3TE, ICM or ALL embryo). Linear regression model was used to test the relationship between the distributions and the proportion of aneuploid cells across the four embryo sections. Fisher's exact test was used to test for random allocation of aneuploid cells between TE and ICM.
All ICM biopsy procedures displayed ICM cells in the recovered fraction with a mean number of ICM cells of 26.2 and a mean TE cell contamination rate of 2%. By FISH reanalysis of previously aCGH-screened blastocysts, a total of 66 aneuploidies were scored, 52 (78.8%) observed in all cells and 14 (21.2%) mosaic. Overall, mosaic chromosomal errors were observed only in 11 out of 70 blastocysts (15.7%) but only 2 cases were classified as mosaic diploid/aneuploid (2.9%). Sensitivity and specificity of aCGH on TE clinical biopsies were 98.0 and 100% per embryo and 95.2 and 99.8% per chromosome, respectively. Linear regression analysis performed on the 11 mosaic diploid/aneuploid chromosomal segregations showed a significant positive correlation between the distribution and the proportion of aneuploid cells across the four-blastocyst sections (P < 0.01). In addition, regression analysis revealed that both the grade and the distribution of mosaic abnormal cells were significantly correlated with the likelihood of being diagnosed by aCGH performed on clinical TE biopsies (P = 0.019 and P < 0.01, respectively). Fisher's exact test for the 66 aneuploidies recorded showed no preferential allocation of abnormal cells between ICM and TE (P = 0.33).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study is limited to non-transferable embryos, reanalyzed for only nine chromosomes and excludes segmental imbalance and uniparental disomy. The prevalence of aneuploidy in the study group is likely to be higher than in the general population of clinical PGD embryos.
This study showed high accuracy of diagnosis achievable during blastocyst stage PGS cycles coupled with 24-chromosomes molecular karyotyping analysis. The new ICM isolation strategy developed may open new possibilities for basic research in embryology and for clinical grade derivation of human embryonic stem cells.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was sought or obtained for this study.
滋养外胚层(TE)细胞的综合染色体筛查(CCS)是否能准确预测内细胞团(ICM)的染色体组成?
TE 样本的综合染色体筛查不太可能受到嵌合体的影响,并且具有高诊断准确性的潜力。
染色体非整倍体筛查的有效性受到可用技术和胚胎中的染色体嵌合体的限制。结合不断改进的冷冻保存和囊胚培养方法,TE 活检和 CCS 被认为是选择用于转移的二倍体胚胎的一种有前途的方法。
研究设计、大小和持续时间:该研究于 2011 年 1 月至 2011 年 8 月进行。在第一部分中,开发了一种新的 ICM 分离方法,并在 20 个良好形态的囊胚上进行了测试。在研究的主要阶段,使用荧光原位杂交(FISH)重新分析了从 26 名接受囊胚阶段 array 比较基因组杂交(aCGH)PGS 周期的患者中获得的 70 个胚胎分离的 ICM 和 TE。
材料、设置和方法:通过免疫染色 KRT18 对分离的 ICM 和 TE 部分进行特征描述。然后,根据 TE aCGH 分析获得的先前遗传诊断,选择不可转移的冷冻胚胎进行 FISH 重新分析。包括染色体拷贝数为二倍体(20 个)或诊断为单倍体(40 个)或双非整倍体(10 个)的囊胚。在将胚胎制备成一个 ICM 和三个大小相等的 TE 部分后,准备好进行胚胎 FISH 重新分析。根据 FISH 重新分析测量 aCGH 的准确性。将导致二倍体/非整倍体嵌合体的染色体分离归类为“低”、“中”和“高”级,并根据其分布(1TE、2TE、3TE、ICM 或 ALL 胚胎)进行分类。线性回归模型用于测试四个胚胎部分之间的嵌合体分布和非整倍体细胞比例之间的关系。Fisher 确切检验用于检验 TE 和 ICM 之间非整倍体细胞的随机分配。
所有 ICM 活检程序均显示在回收部分中存在 ICM 细胞,平均 ICM 细胞数为 26.2,平均 TE 细胞污染率为 2%。通过对先前 aCGH 筛选的囊胚进行 FISH 重新分析,共检出 66 个非整倍体,其中 52 个(78.8%)观察到所有细胞,14 个(21.2%)为嵌合体。总体而言,仅在 70 个囊胚中的 11 个(15.7%)中观察到嵌合染色体错误,但只有 2 个病例被归类为嵌合体二倍体/非整倍体(2.9%)。aCGH 在 TE 临床活检中的敏感性和特异性分别为每个胚胎 98.0%和 100%,每个染色体 95.2%和 99.8%。对 11 例嵌合性二倍体/非整倍体染色体分离进行线性回归分析显示,在四个囊胚部分之间,嵌合体分布和非整倍体细胞比例之间存在显著的正相关(P < 0.01)。此外,回归分析显示,嵌合异常细胞的等级和分布均与 aCGH 在 TE 临床活检中的诊断可能性显著相关(P = 0.019 和 P < 0.01,分别)。对记录的 66 个非整倍体进行 Fisher 确切检验显示,异常细胞在 ICM 和 TE 之间没有优先分配(P = 0.33)。
局限性、谨慎的原因:该研究仅限于不可转移的胚胎,仅重新分析了 9 条染色体,不包括片段性不平衡和单亲二体性。研究组的非整倍体发生率可能高于临床 PGD 胚胎的一般人群。
这项研究显示了在囊胚阶段 PGS 周期中进行高诊断准确性的可能性,同时进行了 24 条染色体分子核型分析。新开发的 ICM 分离策略可能为胚胎学的基础研究和临床级别的人类胚胎干细胞衍生开辟新的可能性。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究未寻求或获得特定资金。