HHMI, Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 5;33(23):9813-30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4579-12.2013.
Inhibitory GABAergic interneurons have been extensively studied but their contribution to circuit dynamics remain poorly understood. Although it has been suggested that interneurons, especially those belonging to the same subclass, synchronize their activity and impart this synchrony onto their local network, recent theoretical and experimental work have challenged this view. To better understand the activity of interneurons during cortical activity, we combined molecular identification, two-photon imaging, and electrophysiological recordings in thalamocortical slices from mouse somatosensory cortex. Using calcium imaging to monitor cortical activity, we found low spiking correlations among parvalbumin or somatostatin interneurons during cortical UP states, indicating that interneurons do not synchronize their firing. Intracellular recordings confirmed that nearby interneurons do not display more synchronous spiking than excitatory cells. The lack of interneuron synchrony was also evident during slow oscillations, even among interneurons that were electrically coupled via gap junctions, suggesting that their coupling does not function to synchronize their activity. Using voltage-clamp recordings from nearby pyramidal cells, we found that inhibitory currents (IPSCs) are more correlated than excitatory ones, but that correlated IPSCs arise from the activation of common presynaptic inhibitory cells, rather than from synchronization of interneuron activity. Finally, we demonstrate that pharmacologically reducing inhibitory currents increases correlated excitatory activity. We conclude that inhibitory interneurons do not have synchronous activity during UP states, and that their function may be to decorrelate rather than to synchronize the firing of neurons within the local network.
抑制性 GABA 能中间神经元已经得到了广泛的研究,但它们对电路动力学的贡献仍知之甚少。尽管有人认为中间神经元,特别是属于同一亚类的中间神经元,会同步它们的活动,并将这种同步性传递给它们的局部网络,但最近的理论和实验工作对这一观点提出了挑战。为了更好地理解皮层活动期间中间神经元的活动,我们在来自小鼠体感皮层的丘脑皮层切片中结合了分子鉴定、双光子成像和电生理记录。使用钙成像来监测皮层活动,我们发现在皮层 UP 状态期间,parvalbumin 或 somatostatin 中间神经元之间的尖峰相关性较低,表明中间神经元不会同步它们的放电。细胞内记录证实,附近的中间神经元的放电同步性并不比兴奋性细胞高。在慢波振荡期间,甚至在通过缝隙连接电耦联的中间神经元之间,也明显缺乏中间神经元的同步性,这表明它们的耦联并不能起到同步其活动的作用。使用来自附近锥体神经元的电压钳记录,我们发现抑制性电流(IPSCs)比兴奋性电流更相关,但相关的 IPSCs 是由共同的突触前抑制细胞的激活引起的,而不是由中间神经元活动的同步引起的。最后,我们证明通过药理学方法降低抑制性电流会增加相关的兴奋性活动。我们得出结论,在 UP 状态期间,抑制性中间神经元没有同步活动,它们的功能可能是去相关,而不是同步局部网络中神经元的放电。