Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Chest. 2013 Jun;143(6):1618-1625. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0750.
We previously reported the prognostic impact of the number of involved lymph nodes (LNs) on survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unknown whether the total number or anatomic location of involved LNs is a superior prognostic factor.
A total of 689 patients with NSCLC who underwent complete resection involving dissection of the hilar and mediastinal LNs with curative intent of ≥ 10 LNs were enrolled. The association between the total number of LNs (nN) involved and survival was assessed by comparison with the anatomic location of LN involvement (pathologic lymph node [pN]), the present nodal category.
We classified the patients into five categories according to the combined pN and nN status as follows: pN0-nN0, pN1-nN1-3, pN1-nN4-, pN2-nN1-3, and pN2-nN4. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the pN1-nN4- and pN2-nN1-3 categories, pN2-nN1-3 had better prognoses than pN1-nN4-. On multivariate analysis, the nN category was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival and disease-free survival (vs nN4-; the hazard ratios of nN0 and nN1-3 for overall survival were 0.223 and 0.369, respectively, P < .0001 for all), similar to the pN category. We propose a new classification based on a combination of the pN and nN categories: namely, N0 becomes pN0-nN0, the N1 category becomes pN1-nN1-3, the N2a category becomes pN2-nN1-3 + pN1-nN4-, and the N2b category becomes pN2-nN4. Each survival curve was proportional and was well distributed among the curves.
A combined anatomically based pN stage classification and numerically based nN stage classification is a more accurate prognostic determinant in patients with NSCLC, especially in the prognostically heterogeneous pN1 and pN2 cases. Further large-scale international cohort validation analyses are warranted.
我们之前报道了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中淋巴结受累数目(LNs)对生存的预后影响。然而,目前尚不清楚总受累淋巴结数(nN)或受累淋巴结的解剖位置是更优的预后因素。
共纳入 689 例接受完全切除术且以根治性目的至少清扫 10 枚淋巴结的 NSCLC 患者。通过与淋巴结受累的解剖位置(病理淋巴结 [pN],当前淋巴结分类)进行比较,评估总淋巴结数(nN)与生存的关系。
我们根据联合 pN 和 nN 状态将患者分为以下五类:pN0-nN0、pN1-nN1-3、pN1-nN4-、pN2-nN1-3 和 pN2-nN4。虽然 pN1-nN4-与 pN2-nN1-3 两组之间无统计学差异,但 pN2-nN1-3 比 pN1-nN4-的预后更好。多变量分析显示,nN 分类是总生存和无病生存的独立预后因素(与 nN4-相比;nN0 和 nN1-3 的总生存风险比分别为 0.223 和 0.369,所有 P <.0001),与 pN 分类相似。我们提出了一种基于 pN 和 nN 分类结合的新分类:即 pN0 成为 pN0-nN0,pN1 成为 pN1-nN1-3,pN2a 成为 pN2-nN1-3 + pN1-nN4-,pN2b 成为 pN2-nN4。每条生存曲线呈比例且在曲线之间分布良好。
基于解剖的 pN 分期分类和基于数值的 nN 分期分类相结合是 NSCLC 患者更准确的预后判断因素,尤其是在预后异质性较大的 pN1 和 pN2 病例中。需要进一步进行大规模国际队列验证分析。