• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠系膜动脉狭窄分级的无创成像模态比较

Comparison of noninvasive imaging modalities for stenosis grading in mesenteric arteries.

作者信息

Schaefer P J, Pfarr J, Trentmann J, Wulff A M, Langer C, Siggelkow M, Groß J, Knabe H, Schaefer F K W

机构信息

Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel.

出版信息

Rofo. 2013 Jul;185(7):628-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335212. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1335212
PMID:23740311
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively analyze duplex sonography, CTA, and MRA with respect to stenosis grading of the celiac trunk (TC) and the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), with DSA as the reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

52 subjects were enrolled (mean age: 71). The image quality was graded: 1-insufficient, 2-bad, 3-moderate, 4-good or 5-excellent. Stenosis was graded: 1 (< 25 %), 2 (25 - < 50 %), 3 (50 - 75 %) or 4 (75 %). Two-sided chi-square tests were used to check for correlation of stenosis grading between modalities. The weighted Cohen's kappa was calculated to assess the strength of correlation. With a threshold of 50 % for non-relevant stenosis vs. relevant stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean image quality was 3.8 ± 0.7, 3.1 ± 1.0, 4.4 ± 0.7, and 3.8 ± 0.9 for DSA, duplex sonography, CTA, and MRA, respectively. For both TC and SMA, stenosis grading reached a significant level of correlation between each noninvasive modality with DSA (p < 0.001, each). The weighted Cohen's kappa for duplex sonography/CTA/MRA was 0.94/0.93/0.74, respectively, for the TC and 0.64/0.91/0.56, respectively, for the SMA. Highest sensitivity/specificity/NPV/PPV/accuracy were found for CTA with 100 %/95 %/85 %/100 %/96 % for the TC and with na/98 %/na/100 %/98 %, respectively, for the SMA.

CONCLUSION

CTA provided the best image quality, reached the highest level of agreement and significance in correlation in stenosis grading, and offered the best diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

目的

以前瞻性方式,以数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为参考,分析双功超声、CT血管造影(CTA)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)在腹腔干(TC)和肠系膜上动脉(SMA)狭窄分级方面的情况。

材料与方法

纳入52名受试者(平均年龄:71岁)。对图像质量进行分级:1级-不足,2级-差,3级-中等,4级-良好或5级-优秀。对狭窄程度进行分级:1级(<25%),2级(25%-<50%),3级(50%-75%)或4级(75%)。使用双侧卡方检验来检查不同检查方式之间狭窄分级的相关性。计算加权科恩kappa系数以评估相关性强度。以50%作为非相关狭窄与相关狭窄的阈值,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。

结果

DSA、双功超声、CTA和MRA的平均图像质量分别为3.8±0.7、3.1±1.0、4.4±0.7和3.8±0.9。对于TC和SMA,每种非侵入性检查方式与DSA之间的狭窄分级均达到显著的相关性水平(均p<0.001)。对于TC,双功超声/CTA/MRA的加权科恩kappa系数分别为0.94/0.93/0.74,对于SMA分别为0.64/0.91/0.

相似文献

1
Comparison of noninvasive imaging modalities for stenosis grading in mesenteric arteries.肠系膜动脉狭窄分级的无创成像模态比较
Rofo. 2013 Jul;185(7):628-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335212. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
2
High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine.颈动脉高分辨率稳态磁共振血管成像:血管内造影剂是否必需?:钆贝葡胺的可行性和初步经验。
Invest Radiol. 2009 Dec;44(12):784-92. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181bfe38a.
3
Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.钆贝葡胺增强磁共振血管造影:与数字减影血管造影相比,四种剂量用于检测和分级颈动脉、肾动脉及主-髂动脉狭窄的诊断性能
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;26(4):1020-32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21127.
4
Non-contrast MR angiography using three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession imaging for evaluation of stenosis in the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery: a preliminary comparative study with computed tomography angiography.使用三维平衡稳态自由进动成像的非对比磁共振血管造影术评估腹腔干和肠系膜上动脉狭窄:与计算机断层血管造影术的初步对比研究
Br J Radiol. 2017 Jul;90(1075):20170011. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170011. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.动脉内数字减影血管造影、磁共振血管造影和双功超声检查在测量颈动脉狭窄方面的比较。
Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1422-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01255.x.
6
Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.通过多期对比增强磁共振血管造影术检测前臂血液透析动静脉内瘘狭窄:初步经验
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Jan;17(1):54-64. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10225.
7
Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.磁共振血管造影在下肢远端旁路手术随访中的应用:与双功超声和数字减影血管造影的比较
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Nov;15(11):1269-77. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000137404.44683.75.
8
Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.失功血液透析通路动静脉内瘘和移植物的狭窄检测:彩色多普勒超声、对比增强磁共振血管造影和数字减影血管造影的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct;42(4):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.06.006.
9
3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.3T对比增强磁共振血管造影术用于评估颅内动脉:与时间飞跃磁共振血管造影术及多层螺旋CT血管造影术的比较
Invest Radiol. 2006 Nov;41(11):799-805. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000242835.00032.f5.
10
[MR aortofemorography versus DSA: prospective evaluation].
JBR-BTR. 2002 Oct-Nov;85(5):246-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Treatment Strategies for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Comprehensive Review.慢性肠系膜缺血治疗策略的进展:综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7112. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227112.
2
Clinical impact of a celiac axis stenosis in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery.行肝胆外科手术的患者发生腹腔干狭窄的临床影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 16;408(1):279. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03003-2.
3
2D-perfusion angiography for intra-procedural endovascular treatment response assessment in chronic mesenteric ischemia: a feasibility study.
2D 灌注血管造影术在慢性肠系膜缺血血管内治疗反应评估中的应用:一项可行性研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 May 16;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00820-7.
4
Early Identification of Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia with Endoscopic Duplex Ultrasound.经内镜双功能超声早期诊断慢性肠系膜缺血。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Apr 8;18:233-243. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S358570. eCollection 2022.
5
Validation of computed tomography angiography using mean arterial pressure gradient as a reference in stented superior mesenteric artery.基于平均动脉压梯度的 CT 血管造影术在支架置入治疗的肠系膜上动脉中的验证。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Feb;46(2):792-798. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02700-6. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
6
European guidelines on chronic mesenteric ischaemia - joint United European Gastroenterology, European Association for Gastroenterology, Endoscopy and Nutrition, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, Netherlands Association of Hepatogastroenterologists, Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and Dutch Mesenteric Ischemia Study group clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia.欧洲慢性肠系膜缺血指南 - 联合欧洲胃肠病学、欧洲胃肠病学、内镜和营养学会、欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会、荷兰肝胆病学会、希腊胃肠病学会、心血管和介入放射学会和荷兰肠系膜缺血研究小组的临床指南,用于诊断和治疗慢性肠系膜缺血患者。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 May;8(4):371-395. doi: 10.1177/2050640620916681. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Review Article: Mesenteric Ischemia.综述文章:肠系膜缺血。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 Mar 17;22(4):17. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-0754-x.
8
Clinical management of chronic mesenteric ischemia.慢性肠系膜缺血的临床管理。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):179-188. doi: 10.1177/2050640618817698. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up.钙化评分与动脉狭窄分级:两种基于CT的方法用于食管切除及胃上提术后吻合口漏风险评估的比较
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Apr 17;14:721-727. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S157352. eCollection 2018.
10
Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols.血管CT与MRI:成像协议实用指南
Insights Imaging. 2018 Apr;9(2):215-236. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0597-2. Epub 2018 Mar 14.