• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺单纯导管原位癌的 MRI 表现:诊断的敏感性及病灶特征的影响

Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):1731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.002
PMID:23743052
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity of breast MRI in the detection of pure DCIS and to analyze the influence of lesion type and nuclear grade.

METHODS

58 consecutive patients with pathologically proven pure DCIS and preoperatively performed breast MRI were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Sensitivities in the detection of DCIS were calculated for MRI and mammography (Mx). Influence of MRI lesion type and nuclear grading on DCIS diagnosis was evaluated.

RESULTS

MRI detected pure DCIS with a sensitivity of 79.3%. The sensitivity of Mx was lower (69%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.345). 46.2% of the DCIS presented as enhancing mass and 53.8% as non-mass-like enhancement (NMLE). None of the masses but 21.4% (n=6) of the NMLE were underestimated as probably benign (BI-RADS 3). MRI measured lesion sizes showed a moderate correlation (r=0.74) with histopathologically measured lesion sizes. MRI detection rate of DCIS decreased significantly (p=0.0458) with increasing nuclear grade. Calculated sensitivities were 100% for low-grade DCIS, 84.6% for intermediate-grade DCIS, and 66.7% for high-grade DCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study MRI could detect pure DCIS more sensitively than Mx. Despite of missing statistically significance preoperative MRI seems to be helpful in patients with DCIS who are eligible for breast conservation. This applies in particular to patients with non-high-grade DCIS because those were significantly more often positive on MRI and significantly more often negative on Mx. Misinterpretation occurs especially in cases of NMLE and high-grade DCIS and therefore a correlation with Mx is also recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估乳腺 MRI 在检测单纯 DCIS 中的敏感性,并分析病变类型和核分级的影响。

方法

回顾性分析 58 例经病理证实为单纯 DCIS 且术前行乳腺 MRI 的连续患者。计算 MRI 和乳腺 X 线摄影(Mx)对 DCIS 的检出率。评估 MRI 病变类型和核分级对 DCIS 诊断的影响。

结果

MRI 检测单纯 DCIS 的敏感性为 79.3%。Mx 的敏感性较低(69%),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.345)。46.2%的 DCIS 表现为强化肿块,53.8%为非肿块样强化(NMLE)。NMLE 中无一肿块(21.4%,n=6)被低估为可能良性(BI-RADS 3)。MRI 测量的病变大小与组织病理学测量的病变大小呈中度相关(r=0.74)。MRI 对 DCIS 的检出率随核分级的增加而显著降低(p=0.0458)。计算的敏感性分别为低级别 DCIS 为 100%,中级别 DCIS 为 84.6%,高级别 DCIS 为 66.7%。

结论

在本研究中,MRI 比 Mx 更能敏感地检测出单纯 DCIS。尽管术前 MRI 缺乏统计学意义,但对于有保乳适应证的 DCIS 患者似乎有帮助。这尤其适用于非高级别 DCIS 患者,因为这些患者在 MRI 上阳性的比例明显更高,在 Mx 上阴性的比例明显更高。错误解读尤其发生在 NMLE 和高级别 DCIS 病例中,因此也建议与 Mx 相关联。

相似文献

1
Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics.乳腺单纯导管原位癌的 MRI 表现:诊断的敏感性及病灶特征的影响
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):1731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
2
BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.导管原位癌的乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)MRI增强特征
Breast J. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):545-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00513.x.
3
Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?“非肿块型”与“肿块型”浸润性导管乳腺癌的预后因素是否存在差异?
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
4
BI-RADS-MRI terminology and evaluation of intraductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ.BI-RADS-MRI 术语及导管原位癌和导管内癌的评估。
Breast Cancer. 2013 Jan;20(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s12282-011-0312-3. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
5
MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.磁共振成像用于诊断纯导管原位癌:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Lancet. 2007 Aug 11;370(9586):485-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-X.
6
MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.在粗针活检术前被诊断为纯导管原位癌的癌症的MRI表现。
Acta Radiol. 2011 Dec 1;52(10):1064-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110213. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
7
[MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].[磁共振成像在乳腺导管原位癌敏感性方面优于乳腺钼靶:122例病例分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan 1;51(1):26-9.
8
MRI morphological classification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) correlating with different biological behavior.MRI 形态学分类在导管原位癌(DCIS)与不同生物学行为相关性中的作用。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.084. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
9
Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?乳腺 MRI 计算机辅助检测(CAD)能否提高在 MRI 筛查中检测到并建议高危人群进行活检的病变的放射科医生的准确性?
Clin Radiol. 2009 Dec;64(12):1166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
10
The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.动态对比增强磁共振成像和乳腺特异性γ成像对伴有钙化和非钙化导管原位癌女性的诊断敏感性
Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):668-75. doi: 10.1177/0284185113505086. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict the Preoperative Size and Nuclear Grade of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?乳房X线摄影和磁共振成像能否预测纯导管原位癌的术前大小和核分级?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;15(14):1801. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141801.
2
Integrating radiomics into predictive models for low nuclear grade DCIS using machine learning.将放射组学整合到使用机器学习的低核级导管原位癌预测模型中。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 3;15(1):7505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92080-y.
3
Comparison of locoregional recurrence risk among nipple-sparing mastectomy, skin-sparing mastectomy, and simple mastectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a single-center study.
保乳手术、乳腺切除术和单纯乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌患者的局部区域复发风险比较:一项单中心研究。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Nov;31(6):1010-1017. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01613-2. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative detection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: a comparison with low-energy image and magnetic resonance imaging.增强型乳腺钼靶摄影在乳腺导管原位癌术前检测中的作用:与低能影像和磁共振成像的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):3342-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10312-z. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
5
Feasibility analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics features for preoperative prediction of nuclear grading of ductal carcinoma in situ.基于磁共振成像的影像组学特征对导管原位癌核分级术前预测的可行性分析
Gland Surg. 2023 Sep 25;12(9):1209-1223. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-132. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
6
Comparison and risk factors analysis of multiple breast cancer screening methods in the evaluation of breast non-mass-like lesions.比较多种乳腺癌筛查方法在评估乳腺非肿块性病变中的应用,并分析其危险因素。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00921-3.
7
Does pre-operative breast MRI have an impact on surgical outcomes in high-grade DCIS?术前乳腺 MRI 是否会影响高级别 DCIS 的手术结果?
Br J Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;95(1138):20220306. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220306. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
8
The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像预测纯导管原位癌大小的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Jun 29;8(1):77. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00441-x.
9
Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial).术前乳腺 MRI 对新诊断的导管原位癌的应用:多中心研究中的影像学特征和表现(ECOG-ACRIN E4112 试验)。
Radiology. 2021 Oct;301(1):66-77. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204743. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
10
Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).术前乳腺磁共振成像在导管原位癌患者中的应用: 欧洲委员会乳腺癌倡议(ECIBC)的系统评价。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):5880-5893. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07873-2. Epub 2021 May 30.